[25328] in Perl-Users-Digest
Perl-Users Digest, Issue: 7573 Volume: 10
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Sun Dec 26 03:05:57 2004
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 00:05:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Perl-Users Digest <Perl-Users-Request@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU>
To: Perl-Users@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Perl-Users Digest Sun, 26 Dec 2004 Volume: 10 Number: 7573
Today's topics:
Re: Basic CGI.pm question <ebohlman@omsdev.com>
Re: Good practice to detect empty string? <dformosa@zeta.org.au>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <dummy@dummy.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Is zero even or odd? <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Re: Page can not be displayed... <ebohlman@omsdev.com>
Re: perl trim function (David Combs)
perl <ravikumarbe@gmail.com>
Re: perl <dha@panix.com>
Re: perl <tadmc@augustmail.com>
Re: perl <see_sig@invalid>
Re: perl <someone@example.com>
Re: run Perl under windows <tintin@invalid.invalid>
Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01) (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 26 Dec 2004 06:33:45 GMT
From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@omsdev.com>
Subject: Re: Basic CGI.pm question
Message-Id: <Xns95CB6E6F3734ebohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4>
Jim Gibson <jgibson@mail.arc.nasa.gov> wrote in
news:221220041016333047%jgibson@mail.arc.nasa.gov:
> I test simple CGI scripts by putting, for example,
>
> if( $test ) {
> $ENV{QUERY_STRING} = 'abc=123' unless defined $ENV{QUERY_STRING};
> $ENV{REQUEST_METHOD] = 'GET' unless defined $ENV{REQUEST_METHOD};
> $ENV{CONTENT_LENGTH} = 0 unless defined $ENV{CONTENT_LENGTH};
> }
>
> at the begining of my program, before I create a CGI object instance.
Since the case where those variables are defined but empty is
uninteresting, the neuromuscular structures in your wrists would probably
appreciate you writing
$ENV{QUERY_STRING} ||= 'abc=123';
,etc. instead.
------------------------------
Date: 26 Dec 2004 15:31:06 +1100
From: ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@zeta.org.au>
Subject: Re: Good practice to detect empty string?
Message-Id: <m3acs17kad.fsf@dformosa.zeta.org.au>
"jl_post@hotmail.com" <jl_post@hotmail.com> writes:
[...]
> This subject has come up several times with my peers, and I'm still
> amazed what some programmers will favor in the name of efficiency and
> speed. For example, some people will refuse to ever use the line:
>
> $i++;
>
> when $i is just an integer. Instead, they will say the code is wrong
> unless it is written as:
>
> ++$i;
>
> or:
>
> $i += 1;
>
> The reason they think that using the post-increment operator is wrong
> is because it makes an extra copy that is never used (which is slower
> and less efficient).
And they would be very wrong, because in perl the optimizer will
notice that and optimize it away.
--
Please excuse my spelling as I suffer from agraphia. See
http://dformosa.zeta.org.au/~dformosa/Spelling.html to find out more.
Free the Memes.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:04:08 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <0fkss0t69cr80ea5vvdhlprnthfd4sfven@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:06:22 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:
>
>
>vonroach wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 20:18:14 +0000, John Woodgate
>> <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Although it's called aleph-one, no-one knows whether it is
>>>the *next* infinity after aleph-null, or whether there are other
>>>infinities in between.
>>
>>
>> I know, but I'm not about to share that information with nitwits who
>> post here.
>
>Really? You are the arrogant bastard- and I'm not quite sure what you
>know because the non-existence of infinity strictly between countability
>and first uncountability ( power set of countability) has been shown to
>be equivalent to the Axiom of Choice.
Actually my birth was carefully recorded, but I doubt yours was. I am
arrogant and amused at all the systems devised by the Quantum
believers in their imaginary statistical mechanics to remove infinity
from their mathematical equations. I doubt quarks are worried about
their infinitesimal realm.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:11:34 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <14lss013pcuhlr9qfk38m6aq78rni8ldc6@4ax.com>
On 24 Dec 2004 16:13:35 +0100, Torkel Franzen <torkel@sm.luth.se>
wrote:
>Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
>
>> ... because the non-existence of infinity strictly between countability
>> and first uncountability ( power set of countability) has been shown to
>> be equivalent to the Axiom of Choice.
>
> You're mistaken about this. Why these ill-informed exchanges in all
>these unrelated groups?
>
Torkel, as Francis Bacon observed hundreds of years ago, this is the
inevitable babble that arises where discourse contains terms that have
not been carefully defined. `Infinity' is just such a quintessential
ambiguous term.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:19:25 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <colss0p3jnhrpmuvqnae0ipj65kc107k81@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:34:06 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:
> was based on an off hand remark by Halmos in his General
>Topology, and he was almost certainly referring to this result, the date
>is about right.
Humm... off hand remark of about the right date, you say, Well it's
certainly hard to argue with that.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:25:35 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <t2mss0ppv8gqa4e66fs1e646rf9fbj47jd@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:06:58 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:
> I am assuming that that
snip
> maybe that's where I'm going wrong.
Ah, the killer unwarranted assumption. Very dangerous.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:33:53 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <rbmss0pght6hacutgsncdle4ktnlfsn5r8@4ax.com>
On 24 Dec 2004 21:59:56 +0100, Torkel Franzen <torkel@sm.luth.se>
wrote:
> "Fairly easy" seems to me an exaggeration.
And a casual comment intended to add support to an argument or
statement that is uncertain. `Clearly', `undoubtedly', `without
doubt', `it seems certain', and many others are in common use by
sophists and those who are just wrong.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:36:57 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <7qmss0td64m5h2dmfmg1sjcgauk8rqascg@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 21:44:37 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:
>I don't think you mean well-ordered in the algebraic sense- you mean a
>total ordering on the cardinals.
Perhaps a question would be more direct than an opinion as to the
meaning of another.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:52:45 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <75nss09h3c33r8jb7g78d4p8ba83aag0ld@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 14:58:51 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:
>
>
>vonroach wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:40:32 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Wrong- where do you get off saying (2*0)/0= 2*(0/0) ?
>>
>>
>> (2 x0)/0 = 2x(0/0) . there now is that better?
>
>You must be an idiot- we have just finished telling you that 0/0 is not
>a number- it is a set. You and that other idiot are merely saying that
>if it's a number then it must be a set. Why don't you try demonstrating
>some intelligence by showing how the assumption of it must be a set
>leads to the conclusion that it must be a number? You won't find one
>with your mindless geek symbol manipulation, "nitwit".
Your abstract imagination has led you to a state of hubris. Worse, you
are relying on half forgotten abstract thoughts of others. 0 is a
number symbol, though western counters were not smart enough to
realize it. Division by 0 is undefined, thus it is a meaningless
concept. Infinity is a real and important concept. It is vital to
`Differentiation'. It is an ambiguous concept unless defined. There is
not just one `infinity'.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:57:26 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <p1oss01pod45eekch7b6ffpfdjmmvhmkbg@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:52:34 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:
>Well... Not _really_, it's just a thought measurement.
>---
Careful, you are getting into Planck's range there.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:09:00 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <o9oss01brfvr7geq3ufa8i0h0tiqtrqa9t@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:39:18 GMT, "Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net> wrote:
>How far does an apple roll if it makes two turns?
>Exact answer in apple diameters, please.
>Androcles
>
Ambiguous. An apple may turn without rolling at all.
`Two turns' does not necessarily indicate rotation. There is no
mention of translational motion. Are you new at framing apple
questions?
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:14:41 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <tuoss0hlalnpf1td6eg3pljqdl2acjg9i2@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 20:06:21 +0000 (UTC), Dave Seaman
<dseaman@no.such.host> wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:17:17 GMT, Nicholas O. Lindan wrote:
>> "Dave Seaman" <dseaman@no.such.host> wrote
>
>>> Perhaps I should have said that the Continuum Hypothesis (CH) is the
>>> "hypothesis" (rather than the "proposition") that c = aleph_1. The final
>>> clause says that CH is neither provable nor disprovable; that's what
>>> "independent of the axioms" means.
>
>> Agreed, figured out what I thought you meant, and I think that is what
>> you thought you meant.
>
>> In the original it was hard to tell assertions from negations from
>> perambulations. It seemed to negate an assertion then assert the first
>> assertion and conclude that nothing could be asserted or negated.
>
>> Did I get that right?
>
>I know what I said, but I don't see how I can answer questions about how
>it seemed to you. Such propositions are independent of my axioms.
I would be glad to sum up what you both said. It fits quite well in
these remarks about zero.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:25:09 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <m6pss05h3d7vj25sug79gaiieptbkp9c7t@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:52:38 -0800, "Alfred Z. Newmane"
<a.newmane.remove@eastcoastcz.com> wrote:
>vonroach wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:07:32 -0500, Shawn Corey
>> <shawn.corey@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> vonroach wrote:
>>>> Then infinity is undefined?
>>
>> I did not write this. Please be more careful.
>
>Yes you did.
>See below.
>
>
>From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
>Newsgroups:
>sci.math,comp.soft-sys.matlab,sci.physics,alt.math.undergrad,rec.puzzles
>,sci.astro,sci.electronics.design,comp.lang.perl.misc
>Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
>Organization: n/a
>Message-ID: <fa2js0pd4v6o2cp1c1j8kkn0vubhgaf7lu@4ax.com>
>References: [...snipped...too...many...]
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Lines: 11
>Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:49:45 GMT
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.131.126.33
>X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
>X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1103726985 4.131.126.33 (Wed,
>22 Dec 2004 06:49:45 PST)
>NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 06:49:45 PST
>
>On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:39:22 -0500, "Richards Noah \(IFR LIT MET\)"
><Noah.Richards@infineon.com> wrote:
>
>> You guys are arguing two different things. The argument that 0/0 is
>the set
>> of all integers/reals/whatever you are using is the set theory
>response to
>> the question. However, the more commonly used form is the algebraicly
>> accepted argument that states that division is a function of the
>forms: Z /
>> Z -> Q, R / R -> R, etc. In this definition, division by 0 is
>undefined for
>> all Z or R, including 0. So, you are both correct, but arguing
>different
>> things.
>
>Then infinity is undefined?
>What are you trying to pull here?
>
Alfy, there is nothing in your daffy post to attribute that remark to
me. Did you skip elementary school the day they discussed the meaning
of a question mark at the end of a sentence _?_
To throw a beam of light into the darkness within your skull, I will
add a declarative sentence. Division by 0 is undefined and
meaningless. Infinity is an ambiguous term that must be defined to
have a specific meaning. You will encounter one meaning if you ever
attempt to learn differential calculus.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:32:01 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <8tpss0hbpsvms6j2krf2iv023l4ckgldv4@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:57:21 -0800, "Alfred Z. Newmane"
<a.newmane.remove@eastcoastcz.com> wrote:
>>> j [sqrt(-1)] isn't a number but we still mix it up with numbers.
>>
>> Of course it is a number, thats why we treat it as such.
>
>Ok what it's value then?
>.
square root of -1 is the number that yields -1 when squared. Another
useful abstract concept.
It is termed `imaginary' while most other numbers are just `abstract'.
They all come from the same place.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:34:51 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <i8qss0t5sdahls32tsk3hl20vt460ukmkg@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:58:30 -0800, "Alfred Z. Newmane"
<a.newmane.remove@eastcoastcz.com> wrote:
>(Was refering to infinity (oo))
Alfy - another ambiguous inquiry. An abstract symbol useful in
several concepts.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:37:38 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <vdqss05nlibg2n2b30n8ravhtalt76hnqs@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:22:05 GMT, "Nicholas O. Lindan" <see@sig.com>
wrote:
>I'm still waiting for a jpeg of quantity sqrt(-1) apples.
>I confess my imagination does not stretch this far.
Then you are out of luck. I must confess, I thought the apples in
your request were imaginary.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:40:09 GMT
From: "Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <tVtzd.10673$0W6.9462@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk>
"vonroach" <hadrainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:o9oss01brfvr7geq3ufa8i0h0tiqtrqa9t@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:39:18 GMT, "Androcles" <dummy@dummy.net> wrote:
>
>>How far does an apple roll if it makes two turns?
>>Exact answer in apple diameters, please.
>>Androcles
>>
> Ambiguous. An apple may turn without rolling at all.
I asked you how far it rolls, not whether it rolls or not.
> `Two turns' does not necessarily indicate rotation. There is no
> mention of translational motion. Are you new at framing apple
> questions?
No. Nor do I have to use the word "translational", since it is implied.
Your difficulty in understanding plain English is obvious if you cannot
comprehend "roll".
Androcles.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:46:14 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <ukqss09e75v01gvaqro1i3erknvgck22r6@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:08:19 -0800, "Alfred Z. Newmane"
<a.newmane.remove@eastcoastcz.com> wrote:
>Gordon Weast wrote:
>> Alfred Z. Newmane wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>> oo (infinity isn't a number) so you cannot use it this way.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, if you move out of pure math into something more applied,
>> like physics or signal processing, you find a nice little thing
>> called the Dirac delta function. This seems to have confounded
>> mathemeticians for a while before they finally came around and
>> decided that it really does work.
>>
>> This wonderful function has infinite height and zero width, yet
>> it has area 1. Granted, you can work with a limit as the width
>> goes to 0, but you don't have to.
>>
>> Think Fourier series and Fourier analysis. These wouldn't work
>> without the Dirac delta function.
>>
>> A wonderful example of 0 * oo = 1.
>
>Except for the fact it doesn't follow the basic mathematic principal of
>0 * n = 0 (anything times zero is zero.) Infinity is undefined. Perhaps
>I'm missing something here but how exactly do they get 1 from that?
>
Alfy, take a deep breath. Division by 0 is undefined. The quantum boys
have come up with many schemes to erase infinity from their
calculations. Infinity is an abstract concept with more than one
meaning. 0 multiplied by infinity is babble.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 07:53:46 GMT
From: vonroach <hadrainc@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Is zero even or odd?
Message-Id: <t4rss0duo9eho2urcsibtq302e3s3edqkr@4ax.com>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 19:46:25 GMT, "Nicholas O. Lindan" <see@sig.com>
wrote:
>0^0 is a mess in either system.
A meaningless mess. As Pauli might say `it isn't even wrong'. And
Heisenberg would add a `pile of crap'.
------------------------------
Date: 26 Dec 2004 05:48:57 GMT
From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@omsdev.com>
Subject: Re: Page can not be displayed...
Message-Id: <Xns95CAF3731B70Debohlmanomsdevcom@130.133.1.4>
"A. Sinan Unur" <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid> wrote in
news:Xns95C5258ADE45asu1cornelledu@132.236.56.8:
> Please ponder the responses you have received so far. Re-reading the
> posting guidelines might help.
>
> Otherwise, make sure to fix the error on line 142, otherwise your script
> will not work.
Who was the (UK-based) poster from a while back who'd occasionally ask
Doris the psychic debugger for help on such matters?
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 02:33:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: dkcombs@panix.com (David Combs)
Subject: Re: perl trim function
Message-Id: <cql7ta$dj1$1@reader1.panix.com>
In article <cohnrb$3k4$1@mamenchi.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>,
Anno Siegel <anno4000@lublin.zrz.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
...
>
>Tom Christansen has written the "classical" paper on prototypes and
>their drawbacks. Google for "tchrist prototypes".
google google-GROUPS for ...
David
------------------------------
Date: 25 Dec 2004 18:16:58 -0800
From: "ravi" <ravikumarbe@gmail.com>
Subject: perl
Message-Id: <1104027418.939512.22200@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Hi,
I want Perl notes and study material.
Thanks
ravi
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 02:55:53 +0000 (UTC)
From: "David H. Adler" <dha@panix.com>
Subject: Re: perl
Message-Id: <slrncssa1p.aoq.dha@panix2.panix.com>
On 2004-12-26, ravi <ravikumarbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want Perl notes and study material.
http://learn.perl.org/ would probably be a good starting point.
dha
--
David H. Adler - <dha@panix.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
<< Atheists are so fun to poke with sharp sticks.>>
Or sleep with. Because they try really hard not to scream "OH GOD."
- <<wheelekb>> and Vertilgo in goats-fans
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 20:57:06 -0600
From: Tad McClellan <tadmc@augustmail.com>
Subject: Re: perl
Message-Id: <slrncssa42.8hs.tadmc@magna.augustmail.com>
ravi <ravikumarbe@gmail.com> wrote:
> I want Perl notes and study material.
I want to lose 15 pounds.
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 22:15:23 -0500
From: Bob Walton <see_sig@invalid>
Subject: Re: perl
Message-Id: <41ce2c37$1_1@127.0.0.1>
Tad McClellan wrote:
> ravi <ravikumarbe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I want Perl notes and study material.
>
>
>
> I want to lose 15 pounds.
http://www.141empire.com/bottomline/bl_jan15_03.htm
--
Bob Walton
Email: http://bwalton.com/cgi-bin/emailbob.pl
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 03:54:18 GMT
From: "John W. Krahn" <someone@example.com>
Subject: Re: perl
Message-Id: <KBqzd.9661$Y72.3361@edtnps91>
Tad McClellan wrote:
> ravi <ravikumarbe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I want Perl notes and study material.
>
> I want to lose 15 pounds.
That's about $29 U.S. Do you play poker?
John
--
use Perl;
program
fulfillment
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 20:27:23 +1300
From: "Tintin" <tintin@invalid.invalid>
Subject: Re: run Perl under windows
Message-Id: <3377bnF3sh4bkU1@individual.net>
"wld" <aaabbb16@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dc998cfd.0412250607.a5132c9@posting.google.com...
> Thanks Paul and Henry.
Who are Paul and Henry and why are you thanking them?
> What I like to do is that from a windows xp to connect to Unix and
> router via
> tcp/ip (telnet)and control the unix and the router(send some commands
> to both of them).
> What packages do i need to install and how to do it?
If you have a Cisco router, then Net::Telnet:::Cisco could be useful for
you.
If not, then you can just use Net::Telnet, use ppm to install (see your
ActiveState Perl documentation for more details)
------------------------------
Date: 6 Apr 2001 21:33:47 GMT (Last modified)
From: Perl-Users-Request@ruby.oce.orst.edu (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
Subject: Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01)
Message-Id: <null>
Administrivia:
#The Perl-Users Digest is a retransmission of the USENET newsgroup
#comp.lang.perl.misc. For subscription or unsubscription requests, send
#the single line:
#
# subscribe perl-users
#or:
# unsubscribe perl-users
#
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu.
NOTE: due to the current flood of worm email banging on ruby, the smtp
server on ruby has been shut off until further notice.
To submit articles to comp.lang.perl.announce, send your article to
clpa@perl.com.
#To request back copies (available for a week or so), send your request
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu with the command "send perl-users x.y",
#where x is the volume number and y is the issue number.
#For other requests pertaining to the digest, send mail to
#perl-users-request@ruby.oce.orst.edu. Do not waste your time or mine
#sending perl questions to the -request address, I don't have time to
#answer them even if I did know the answer.
------------------------------
End of Perl-Users Digest V10 Issue 7573
***************************************
