[18736] in Perl-Users-Digest
Perl-Users Digest, Issue: 904 Volume: 10
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Tue May 15 09:05:35 2001
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 06:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Perl-Users Digest <Perl-Users-Request@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU>
To: Perl-Users@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Message-Id: <989931908-v10-i904@ruby.oce.orst.edu>
Content-Type: text
Perl-Users Digest Tue, 15 May 2001 Volume: 10 Number: 904
Today's topics:
Re: Cabal Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision <lmoran@wtsg.com>
Re: Can you build GUI's with perl? (Martien Verbruggen)
Re: Can you build GUI's with perl? <a.v.a@home.nl>
Re: Diary (Tad McClellan)
Re: Emptying all variables in script <c_clarkson@hotmail.com>
Re: Emptying all variables in script (Tad McClellan)
Re: Komodo output on the windows2000 console <c_clarkson@hotmail.com>
Need SNPP Perl CLI interface for NT <probepro@mindspring.com>
Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revisi <flavell@mail.cern.ch>
Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revisi (Martien Verbruggen)
Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revisi (Tad McClellan)
Re: Probably a simple question... (Tad McClellan)
Re: Scrambling the source code <jtalbain@kimochi3d.com>
Re: script via inetd (Tad McClellan)
Re: Taint (Garry Williams)
Re: testing offline (Martien Verbruggen)
Re: testing offline <thunderbear@bigfoot.com>
Re: URGENT: CGI program wanted! (Steve)
Re: Urgent: CGI program wanted <michael@stroeck.com>
use an expanding set of modules (Dave Murray-Rust)
Re: What is wrong with my Regular Expression? (Tad McClellan)
Re: Worldclock program??? <alain@cp59312-a.tilbu1.nb.nl.home.com>
Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01) (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 07:58:17 -0400
From: Lou Moran <lmoran@wtsg.com>
Subject: Re: Cabal Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 1.1 $)
Message-Id: <id62gtkkoep204u1gc61aeeiojvmmbj1l2@4ax.com>
On Mon, 14 May 2001 13:53:32 -0700, "Godzilla!"
<godzilla@stomp.stomp.tokyo> wrote wonderful things about sparkplugs:
>Tad McClellan wrote:
>
>> Chris Stith wrote:
>> > Godzilla! wrote:
>> >> Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> >>> "Kira" == Godzilla! wrote:
>
>(snipped a typical "Tad" tossed temper tantrum)
>
>Don't expect me to slip on a pair of glossy black
>jack boots, a tan khaki shirt accessorized with an
What's with you and Hugo Boss?
>arm band, then march to the beat of your empty
>barrel. My ethical values make no allowances for
>such repugnant behavior, as is yours.
>
>Godzilla!
--
print "\x{263a}"
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 22:07:02 +1000
From: mgjv@tradingpost.com.au (Martien Verbruggen)
Subject: Re: Can you build GUI's with perl?
Message-Id: <slrn9g26v6.v5e.mgjv@martien.heliotrope.home>
On Tue, 15 May 2001 03:21:40 GMT,
Bernie <bfb@att.net> wrote:
> Is it possible to build GUI's with perl, under Linux and
> or Windows? I checked CPAN, but didn't find any modules
> along these lines.
The TK modules, especially if you've already worked with Tk before
(maybe on top of tcl), or the Gtk (Gnome, Glade) modules, especially if
you've already worked with those. Tk is probably more mature, and
probably offers a bit more functionality. Apart from the abovementioned,
there's also Qt, which I have never tried myself.
I personally like Gtk better, but I've never written any major GUIs in
Perl. I just never see any need for them. A CLI or TUI works just as
well, and often better.
Martien
--
Martien Verbruggen |
Interactive Media Division | The gene pool could use a little
Commercial Dynamics Pty. Ltd. | chlorine.
NSW, Australia |
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:38:41 GMT
From: AvA <a.v.a@home.nl>
Subject: Re: Can you build GUI's with perl?
Message-Id: <3B00FB63.1DF6F105@home.nl>
Bernie wrote:
> Is it possible to build GUI's with perl, under Linux and
> or Windows? I checked CPAN, but didn't find any modules
> along these lines.
>
> -Thanks
Use perl-gtk or perl-gnome (or) both
Very well documented and powerfull.
http://personal.riverusers.com/~swilhelm/gtkperl-tutorial/
also read the articles posted in www.perl.com
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 07:32:54 -0400
From: tadmc@augustmail.com (Tad McClellan)
Subject: Re: Diary
Message-Id: <slrn9g24v6.jmt.tadmc@tadmc26.august.net>
Michael Fitzpatrick <michael@michaelfitzpatrick.co.uk> wrote:
>Can anyone tell me where I can find
Use a "search engine" rather than a newsgroup for finding things.
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 06:51:40 -0500
From: "Charles K. Clarkson" <c_clarkson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Emptying all variables in script
Message-Id: <6E16BE9B7FA26A48.8EB2D81F28B0CA50.DE5CDACE2062D50B@lp.airnews.net>
News <neo@accesscable.net> wrote:
: I need to know if there is a way to empty all your variables in a perl
: script at once instead of:
:
: $variable1 = "";
: $variable2 = "";
: $variable3 = "";
:
: This is because I require another script later in the program except the
: script that I require conflicts with some of the variables. Instead of
: emptying them one by one as above I'd like to clear all variables in my
: script at once if that is possible.
:
You could wrap your the beginning of your script in a block and
let your variables go out of scope.
my $variable0;
{
my $variable1;
my $variable2;
my $variable3;
}
$variable0 is still in scope.
$variable1, $variable2, $variable3 can be reused.
HTH,
Charles K. Clarkson
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 08:08:08 -0400
From: tadmc@augustmail.com (Tad McClellan)
Subject: Re: Emptying all variables in script
Message-Id: <slrn9g2718.jmt.tadmc@tadmc26.august.net>
Godzilla! <godzilla@stomp.stomp.tokyo> wrote:
>News wrote:
>
>> I need to know if there is a way to empty all your variables in a perl
>> script at once instead of:
>
>> $variable1 = "";
>> $variable2 = "";
>> $variable3 = "";
>
>> This is because I require another script later in the program except the
>> script that I require conflicts with some of the variables. Instead of
>> emptying them one by one as above I'd like to clear all variables in my
>> script at once if that is possible.
>
>Another has suggested use of reset, a built-in function.
>There is an alternative, a very simple one. Don't use
>variable names which cause conflict. Use unique names.
There is yet another alternative, simpler still since you wouldn't
need to change any variable names:
run the second program via system() instead of "require"ing it.
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
Please ignore Godzilla / Kira -- do not feed the troll.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 07:42:45 -0500
From: "Charles K. Clarkson" <c_clarkson@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Komodo output on the windows2000 console
Message-Id: <A987AAC3BB3C4E28.E066228030164BE9.CA76EC52B50CFA49@lp.airnews.net>
: i debug from the komodo,start up the console windows,inputed what i
: input,and the console windows closed right away after it's displayed
: something on the screen,it's like i have about1/10 second to check out my
: output
: Can anyone teach me how the get rid of this ?
: thanks in advance,i've checked out the properties option of the console
: windows and i got no clue at all .....
:
You can't possibly believe this is a perl question! Can you?!?
Your question refers to the "Windows 2000 console". Now
don't you think that's a Windows question???
That said, find the msdos prompt for komodo. If you don't
know where it is: right click on the start menu item for komodo
and click properties, then hit the 'Find Target' button.
Right click on the msdos prompt file and click on properties.
Under the Program tab uncheck the 'Close on Exit' box. If this
confuses you or you can't find the msdos prompt file, go ask
your question on a Windows newsgroup and leave these
fine perl programmers alone!
Get a clue,
Charles K. Clarkson
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 07:10:31 -0500
From: ".CTS." <probepro@mindspring.com>
Subject: Need SNPP Perl CLI interface for NT
Message-Id: <9dr66g$lhl$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>
I need to call SNPP (Simple Network Pager Protocol) from the NT command
line. I've got a sample Perl script and libraries for UNIX, which I should
be able to adapt to NT if had the right socket.pm for NT. Any help using
this approach or other recommendations would be appreciated.
Chuck
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 11:57:53 +0200
From: "Alan J. Flavell" <flavell@mail.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 1.1 $)
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105151128110.1448-100000@lxplus003.cern.ch>
On 15 May 2001, John Stanley wrote:
> Alan J. Flavell <flavell@mail.cern.ch> wrote:
> >It is considered to be non-optional.
>
> YOU may consider it as such,
It's pretty much irrelevant what I, personally, as an individual,
think about it. As it happens, I appear to agree with long-standing
rules of comportment on the major Usenet groups. But even if I,
personally, disagreed, that wouldn't change the consensus.
> There
> is nothing stopping people from posting without checking the FAQ,
There's nothing actually "stopping" people from committing all kinds
of offence of various kinds. There are, however, consequences
afterwards. Some of them are formal and have formal sanctions; some
of them are informal, and the sanctions are applied with less concern
for the proprieties of justice.
> the claim that is it a requirement before posting is simply silly. It is
> not "non-optional" in fact, only in your opinion.
_My_ individual opinion is not a concern in this regard.
> Why not just speak the truth and let the honest people learn how you
> expect them to behave?
It's interesting that you said in an earlier posting that even where
formal sanctions are involved, you would consider it normal to violate
the rules when there were supervening circumstances. You didn't say
you required the "prohibited to walk on the grass" signs to have a
list of permitted exceptions. Why not?
Where's your proposed wording? The only concrete proposal that I saw
from you was "should", and it seems to me that the discussion already
went against that as being too weak an expression of this piece of
netiquette.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 21:54:53 +1000
From: mgjv@tradingpost.com.au (Martien Verbruggen)
Subject: Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 1.1 $)
Message-Id: <slrn9g268d.v5e.mgjv@martien.heliotrope.home>
On 14 May 2001 23:49:51 GMT,
John Stanley <stanley@skyking.OCE.ORST.EDU> wrote:
> In article <slrn9fqnjt.26h.tadmc@tadmc26.august.net>,
> Tad McClellan <tadmc@augustmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Outline
>>>> Before posting to comp.lang.perl.misc
>>>> Must
>>>
>>>Should.
>>
>>I cannot make the change you suggest.
>
> Why not? You are wrong to say "must", so why can you not correct it?
The wording (not Tad) is wrong in _your_ opinion, but obviously not in
the eyes of many other posters here.
I'll just put in my few cents:
I happen to think that should is much too weak. Must is exactly what it
should read. Must. May not. Must not.
There's no room for "pretty please" in this document.
> I'll make the point by asking a question: which perl .pod did you read
> prior to saying you cannot make the change? If you must read .pod prior
> to posting, but did not, then the "must" is questionable.
Argumentum e absurdum.
>>"Should" implies that it is OK to post without checking the docs.
>
> It is. It is not OK to post questions without checking the docs, but
> you did not limit your statement to "posting questions", and there is
It is not a legal document. It will never have to be defended in any
court of law.
Frankly, I think you're arguing about nothing. There is a definite need
for this document, and hopefully it'll make a difference. it makes more
chance to make a difference if it's kept short, concise and clear.
Adding in paragraphs, subparagraphs, clauses, subclauses and exceptional
footnotes to everything isn't going to achieve that.
> nobody here to make this a must in any case. There is a difference
> between "not ok" and "must not". The best you can say is "should".
Legally, and formally, and whateverly, yeah, the best that could be said
would be should. To be clear however, and in the mind of most people
who've been around for a long time here, the "must" and "may not" are a
much better match, and will convey the message much clearer.
Besides, it is true: To avoid crappy threads, flames and endless
discussions, you _must_ do these things.
> I think there is an example of walking on the grass being tossed about.
Sometimes analogies just don't make it.
Martien
--
Martien Verbruggen | My friend has a baby. I'm writing
Interactive Media Division | down all the noises the baby makes so
Commercial Dynamics Pty. Ltd. | later I can ask him what he meant -
NSW, Australia | Steven Wright
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 07:22:14 -0400
From: tadmc@augustmail.com (Tad McClellan)
Subject: Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 1.1 $)
Message-Id: <slrn9g24b6.jmt.tadmc@tadmc26.august.net>
John Stanley <stanley@skyking.OCE.ORST.EDU> wrote:
>In article <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105150146150.25587-100000@lxplus003.cern.ch>,
>Alan J. Flavell <flavell@mail.cern.ch> wrote:
>>On 14 May 2001, John Stanley wrote:
>>
>>> > Checking the FAQ before posting is required in Big 8 newsgroups in
>>> > general,
>>>
>>> There is not a group I know of that makes this a requirement. It is
>>> highly recommended, but not required.
>let the honest people learn how you
^^^
>expect them to behave?
The whole point of the guidelines is to _state_ what is expected,
rather than having them discover it for themselves.
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 07:35:17 -0400
From: tadmc@augustmail.com (Tad McClellan)
Subject: Re: Probably a simple question...
Message-Id: <slrn9g253l.jmt.tadmc@tadmc26.august.net>
Dennis Schoen <dennis@cobolt.net> wrote:
>s/&/\./g
^
^
Dots are not special (meta) in strings, so there is no need
to backslash them.
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 18:13:33 +0800
From: "Alvin Yap" <jtalbain@kimochi3d.com>
Subject: Re: Scrambling the source code
Message-Id: <9dqv8e$9tr$1@dahlia.singnet.com.sg>
Philip,
Sorry 'bout the line length. Searching through perldoc.com says I need =
to use the "Filter" module to encrypt it... Guess I need to search =
around on info how to *use* this function :-)
Thanks!
Regards,
Alvin
"Philip Newton" <pne-news-20010515@newton.digitalspace.net> wrote in =
message news:vsr1gt8tdmff4gn1h36pljejrigmusfb0g@4ax.com...
> Please fix your line length.
>=20
> On Tue, 15 May 2001 16:18:33 +0800, "Alvin Yap"
> <jtalbain@kimochi3d.com> wrote:
>=20
> > Are there any tutorials/scripts/programs which enable the perl =
source
> > written to be scrambled?
>=20
> Have a look in the FAQ: perldoc -q "hide the source"
>=20
> Cheers,
> Philip
> --=20
> Philip Newton <nospam.newton@gmx.li>
> Yes, that really is my address; no need to remove anything to reply.
> If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 08:04:25 -0400
From: tadmc@augustmail.com (Tad McClellan)
Subject: Re: script via inetd
Message-Id: <slrn9g26q9.jmt.tadmc@tadmc26.august.net>
Sebastian Ramos <ramos@terra7.de> wrote:
>print "hello\n";
>$user = <STDIN>;
>print $user;
>
>the problem is that the first (!) print command follows after the STDIN
>any ideas ?
Put this near the top of your program:
$| = 1; # perldoc perlvar
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:21:43 GMT
From: garry@ifr.zvolve.net (Garry Williams)
Subject: Re: Taint
Message-Id: <slrn9g20pm.1e3.garry@zfw.zvolve.net>
On Tue, 15 May 2001 06:02:24 GMT, Bart Lateur <bart.lateur@skynet.be> wrote:
> Garry Williams wrote:
>
>>> sub untaint ($) { /^(.*)$/ and return $1; }
>>
>>That's what perlsec says to do, if you must. (Although the
>>short-circuit is superfluous, since the match can never fail.)
>
> It can, if there's a newline in the string.
You are right!
$ perl -wle 'print "matched" if "\n" =~ /^(.*)$/'
matched
$ perl -wle 'print "matched" if "\na" =~ /^(.*)$/'
$
Oops. :-)
--
Garry Williams
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 21:55:58 +1000
From: mgjv@tradingpost.com.au (Martien Verbruggen)
Subject: Re: testing offline
Message-Id: <slrn9g26ae.v5e.mgjv@martien.heliotrope.home>
On Mon, 14 May 2001 19:24:38 +0000 (UTC),
Abigail <abigail@foad.org> wrote:
> Amelia Clarke (stu00ac@rdg.ac.uk) wrote on MMDCCCXI September MCMXCIII in
><URL:news:3AFD7E04.F4408DC9@rdg.ac.uk>:
> '' I'm fairly new to perl and have been using it to make cgi scripts - the
> '' only thing is, I'd like to be able to test them fully offline. Is there
> '' a (free) program I can download to allow me to do this?
>
> Sure. I'd say Apache is the most common.
Even Apache doesn't work offline. It needs at least one running CPU.
Martien
--
Martien Verbruggen |
Interactive Media Division |
Commercial Dynamics Pty. Ltd. | What's another word for Thesaurus?
NSW, Australia |
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:42:28 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Thorbj=F8rn?= Ravn Andersen <thunderbear@bigfoot.com>
Subject: Re: testing offline
Message-Id: <3B013244.F8012C6C@bigfoot.com>
Martien Verbruggen wrote:
> > Sure. I'd say Apache is the most common.
>
> Even Apache doesn't work offline. It needs at least one running CPU.
Like the one where the editor of the original poster runs?
--
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...plus...Tubular Bells!"
http://bigfoot.com/~thunderbear
------------------------------
Date: 15 May 2001 11:58:16 GMT
From: steve@zeropps.uklinux.net (Steve)
Subject: Re: URGENT: CGI program wanted!
Message-Id: <slrn9g269o.eeh.steve@zero-pps.localdomain>
On Tue, 15 May 2001 03:05:47 +0100, muksca wrote:
>Sorry to ask here only for weeks now I have tried other groups and resources
>to no avail.
If you'd started reading the docs and coding weeks ago you'd have what you want
by now.
>Anyone here have or know of a perl script which does (or modification) the
>following...
>
>1. User uploads a file to server
Consult the CGI docs that comes with perl, it'll take some tweaking but you'll
get there, remember to use binmode for binary files.
>2. Calls the CGI and prints out environment variables to a txt file (flat
>file dB)
On my index page there's a link to a script that prints this info to screen
which I use for testing stuff, the link is where it says "This page last
updated ....."
>3. Creates a unique directory ON-THE-FLY and puts the upload into that
>directory
To prevent people trying to upload the same file name prefix the file name
with say the ipaddress and the time and date without any punctuation or
spaces so you'd get a file name something like 1014228413502001_MyNewCar.jpg
so the file name will be unique and you can use a simple routine to get the
original file name back at a later date.
For some useful routines see a script I've done:
http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/cgi-bin/upload_screens.cgi
You won't be able to run this script as it requires paramaters from
another script, but all the file upload stuff works fine.
>4. Display a standard thank you page
You know how to do that don't you.
>Ideally each separate upload should be assigned its own directory and
>preserve the original file name.
Answered above.
>--
>NO NONSENSE professional Websites:
Hmmm interesting.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:steve@zeropps.uklinux.net
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.zeropps.uklinux.net/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
12:04pm up 102 days, 12:51, 2 users, load average: 1.11, 1.09, 1.03
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 13:31:14 +0200
From: "Michael Ströck" <michael@stroeck.com>
Subject: Re: Urgent: CGI program wanted
Message-Id: <3b011357$1@e-post.inode.at>
"muksca" <muksca@hotmail.com> schrieb :
> Sorry to ask here only for weeks now I have tried other groups and
resources
> to no avail.
> Anyone here have or know of a perl script which does (or modification) the
> following...
<snip>
> NO NONSENSE professional Websites:
> www.your-new-site.com
1 ) If you have even basic knowledge about programming, you could
have written that script yourself within one to three days without prior
knowledge about Perl.
And in weeks... Even a complete and utter moron should be able
to learn that much Perl ;-)
2) A 1-minute google-search turned up with more than a dozen of websites
like the following:
http://cgi.resourceindex.com/Programs_and_Scripts/Perl/File_Management/
3) Do you think that lying (sig and website) to potential customers
is a good idea ?
Michael Ströck
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:29:23 +0100
From: dave@mo-seph.com (Dave Murray-Rust)
Subject: use an expanding set of modules
Message-Id: <slrn9g24oi.771.dave@flop.localnet>
Hello,
I am currently writing a piece of software which builds up HTML pages
out of a set of 'components'. Each component is represented by a
package/class, one per module, which provides new, view, update etc.
methods. At present, I am including each of these modules by hand
everywhere I need them, which is obviously sub-optimal. Does anyone
have any ideas for avoiding what seems like it must be a common
problem? (I have tried perldoc, and etin)
If it's of any help, a database is involved, and all the modules could
be put in a specific directory
Cheers,
Dave
--
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 07:28:51 -0400
From: tadmc@augustmail.com (Tad McClellan)
Subject: Re: What is wrong with my Regular Expression?
Message-Id: <slrn9g24nj.jmt.tadmc@tadmc26.august.net>
Godzilla! <godzilla@stomp.stomp.tokyo> wrote:
>Ilmari Karonen wrote:
>
>(body content snipped)
>
>> Ilmari Karonen - http://www.sci.fi/~iltzu/
>> Please ignore Godzilla / Kira -- do not feed the troll.
>
>
>Mr. Karonen, I am asking something of you
^^^^^^^^^^^
Thanks for pointing out that you do not like that, I wouldn't
have thought of it if you hadn't mentioned it.
How do you like my new .sig?
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@augustmail.com Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
Please ignore Godzilla / Kira -- do not feed the troll.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:15:14 GMT
From: AvA <alain@cp59312-a.tilbu1.nb.nl.home.com>
Subject: Re: Worldclock program???
Message-Id: <m3wv7jc6ci.fsf@cp59312-a.tilbu1.nb.nl.home.com>
Niall Byrne <nbyrne@lucent.com> writes:
> I have been asked to created a worldclock that will appear on a web page to show
> the time of a number of countries at once.
are u sure u want to use perl for that?
cause u would need to refresh the page every second, which is very annoying to
look at.
> I have been trying to use GIF's, the idea was to create a blank main gif and
> have gif's numbering 0-9. the number would appear on top on the orginal gif and
> a refresh command would keep the time running.
there ya go.
> But my knowledge is nowhere near the level I need, So does anyone here have
> helpful comments or hints?
use some Java for it, makes small applets so they load fast.
i love perl, but for somethings one gotta use another language.
>Thanks
> Niall
Yw AvA
------------------------------
Date: 6 Apr 2001 21:33:47 GMT (Last modified)
From: Perl-Users-Request@ruby.oce.orst.edu (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
Subject: Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01)
Message-Id: <null>
Administrivia:
The Perl-Users Digest is a retransmission of the USENET newsgroup
comp.lang.perl.misc. For subscription or unsubscription requests, send
the single line:
subscribe perl-users
or:
unsubscribe perl-users
to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu.
To submit articles to comp.lang.perl.announce, send your article to
clpa@perl.com.
To request back copies (available for a week or so), send your request
to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu with the command "send perl-users x.y",
where x is the volume number and y is the issue number.
For other requests pertaining to the digest, send mail to
perl-users-request@ruby.oce.orst.edu. Do not waste your time or mine
sending perl questions to the -request address, I don't have time to
answer them even if I did know the answer.
------------------------------
End of Perl-Users Digest V10 Issue 904
**************************************
