[3059] in SIPB_Linux_Development
Re: afs and rc.conf
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathon Weiss)
Sat Oct 7 12:45:43 2000
Message-Id: <200010071645.MAA19961@Bearing-An-Hourglass.mit.edu>
From: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@MIT.EDU>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@MIT.EDU>, linux-dev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "07 Oct 2000 12:39:58 EDT."
<tslitr4a9lt.fsf@sweet-transvestite.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 12:45:30 -0400
> You know the RPMs are installed in an order that preserves
> dependencies.
Do we know that? I thought the restriction was just that there
couldn't be missing rpms at the end of the rpm run. Or is the install
different than an invocation of rpm on a running system in this
respect?
Jonathon
