[2533] in SIPB_Linux_Development

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Sal Sucks (he broke the RedHat-Athena 4.2 installation)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Salvatore Valente)
Mon Feb 8 15:16:54 1999

Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 15:16:18 -0500
To: svalente@MIT.EDU
Cc: warlord@MIT.EDU, linux-dev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <199902082008.PAA15289@tick.dimins.com> (message from Salvatore
	Valente on Mon, 8 Feb 1999 15:08:07 -0500)
From: Salvatore Valente <svalente@MIT.EDU>


Hi.  I wrote:

	Please don't take this the wrong way: ...  [expletive deleteed]

I just wanted to see what it felt like to send rude email.  It turns
out it felt about as bad as I thought it would feel, so I won't do it
again.  Sorry.

Anyway, here's what happened: Someone updated the packages on
sipb-nfs.  I don't know or care who.  But the XFree86-devel package
was corrupted.  A week or two ago, a user came into the sipb office
when I happened to be there and said that the install was failing on
XFree86-devel.  So I ftp'd a new copy of the package and put it in the
updates directory and on the server.  I did non re-run "make server"
or rebuild the hdlist file because I did not, in theory, change the
version/revision of any file on the server.  The hdlist file caches
info from all the .spec files in all the packages on the server, and I
assumed that the .spec file in the corrupted XFree86-devel package
would be the same as that in the good XFree86 package.  I guess it
wasn't.  I guess the .spec file was corrupted in the corrupted
package.  Sorry I didn't notice that, and thanks for fixing it.

Sal.

P.S.  Like I said, I apologize for my previous message; I will never
again send a rude message to linux-dev, and I hope others will do the
same.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post