[2272] in SIPB_Linux_Development
Re: Linux Athena questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Wed Oct 21 16:24:53 1998
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:24:28 -0400
From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
To: linux-dev@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Aaron M. Ucko's message of 21 Oct 1998 15:05:34 -0400
<udlpvblu45d.fsf@cutter-john.mit.edu>
From: amu@MIT.EDU (Aaron M. Ucko)
Date: 21 Oct 1998 15:05:34 -0400
I have no experience with SuSE. Could you compare it with Red Hat and
Debian with respect to issues people have brought up and anything else
you deem relevant?
SuSE is great, well-integrated, made by a small team.
They have a fairly small set of users on this side of the pond, and
they don't have a large number of commercial outfits porting to their
distribution (except some European ones). Their CD comes with a lot
of non-free software, some of it zero-cost.
I have no experience with their bug reporting mechanisms.
