[2057] in SIPB_Linux_Development
Re: thoughts about packaging AFS for new release
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aaron M. Ucko)
Sun Aug 2 13:33:07 1998
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>, linux-dev@MIT.EDU
From: amu@MIT.EDU (Aaron M. Ucko)
Date: 02 Aug 1998 13:32:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: Greg Hudson's message of "Sun, 02 Aug 1998 13:26:54 EDT"
Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > I've changed this in my source tree. I just need to remember to
> > incorporate this into the new package. Also, should it perhaps use
> > /var/vice insted of /usr/vice?
>
> No (contrary to what Aaron says), there are programs and configuration
> files in /usr/vice as well as logfiles and the cache. No other
> platform uses /var/vice for AFS.
When I said "in principal" (sic...dealing with kerberos too much? :-))
I meant according to the Linux file hierarchy standard, which wants
/usr to be potentially read-only.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC <amu@mit.edu> (finger amu@monk.mit.edu)
