[33] in Software Accessibility Project email archive
Re: comments on the guidelines
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nina Davis-Millis)
Wed Feb 14 10:29:19 2001
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010214102804.00e2c7e0@po9.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 10:29:15 -0500
To: Kathleen Cahill <kcahill@MIT.EDU>
From: Nina Davis-Millis <ninadm@MIT.EDU>
Cc: sw-access@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010213155222.009cf600@po12.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
At 03:52 PM 2/13/01 -0500, Kathleen Cahill wrote:
>But that doesn't mean that MIT shouldn't buy them, especially if there
>aren't accessible alternatives.
This is precisely what I was concerned about. I believe people are worried
about this. I think it would be well to clarify this somewhere.
Nina
