[344] in Zephyr Mailing List
Re: should we submit zephyr?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Derrick J Brashear)
Mon Aug 23 16:25:54 1999
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:25:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org>
Reply-To: Derrick J Brashear <shadow@dementia.org>
Cc: zephyr@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <t53aesdacc7.fsf@horowitz.ne.mediaone.net>
Message-Id: <ML-1.3.2.935439914.5758.shadow@johnstown.andrew.cmu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
> geer@MIT.EDU writes:
>
> >> http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-impp-reqts-01.txt
>
> A number of past and current zephyr developers are active in the IMPP
> effort. We all believe that zephyr is not suitable as is, but we are
> doing our best to contribute what we have learned, both successful and
> not, to the group.
As long as a) I don't have to create a public-key infrastructure for my
userbase which would essentially give me nothing over the Kerberos
infrastructure I already have and b) said refusal does not lock us out of
communication with "the rest of the world", I'm happy. Please say you're
pushing to this end?
-D
