[904] in winnt

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: XP

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan McIndoe Hunt)
Fri Aug 30 17:09:13 2002

Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020830170327.02d01bd0@hesiod>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:06:31 -0400
To: Dave Broderick <djbroder@mit.edu>, winpartners@mit.edu
From: Jonathan McIndoe Hunt <jmhunt@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20020830154908.01eee6f0@hesiod>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Hi Dave,

I think you will be fine with Office 2000.  Our testing with Windows XP did 
not reveal any problems.  We have compiled testing results for a number of 
applications on XP at

http://web.mit.edu/swrt/winxp/test-matrix.html

You may wish to consider upgrading in the future to a newer version for new 
features and improvements in the product, though you do not need to just 
because the machines are running Windows XP.  There are a few applications 
that require newer versions to fully function on Windows XP, thankfully 
Office is not one of them.

Enjoy,
Jon

At 03:51 PM 8/30/2002 -0400, Dave Broderick wrote:
>We had to buy laptops this month, and it seemed time to get Thinkpads with 
>XP. Our office staple is Office 2000. Should we-- do we-- have to invest 
>in Office XP ? What think ye?
>
>David J. Broderick
>djbroder@mit.edu
>         Senior Audio Visual Specialist
>         MIT AV 617 253 2808
>         FAX 617 253 5945
>         <http://web.mit.edu/djbroder/www>http://web.mit.edu/djbroder/www


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post