[3933] in testers
Re: behavior change in scan?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Barker)
Wed Apr 7 10:05:57 1999
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 20:07:47 -0400
To: Garry Zacheiss <zacheiss@MIT.EDU>
From: Mike Barker <mbarker@MIT.EDU>
Cc: testers@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <199904060200.WAA22622@mary-kay-commandos>
this would be an nmh change, I think?
I don't remember seeing a list of differences between nmh and mh -- kind of
thought there weren't any significant ones.
this may be an application defaults issue? i.e., is there a default setting
to adjust to make scan act like the old one?
thanks for the catch, Garry!
mike
At 10:00 PM 4/5/99 -0400, Garry Zacheiss wrote:
:) I noticed today that under 8.3, the output of scan lists
:)messages by full name of the sender:
:)
:)2507 04/01 Greg Hudson Athena 8.3 alpha test<<The Athena 8.3 alpha
test
:)2508 04/02 Michal N Lusztig about installing U60 without kbd and
monitors<<H
:)2509 04/02 Teresa Lai Working this summer? Next fall?<<Hi all, We'd
ap
:)2510 04/02 "D'Moon Cuizhang" Need help ASAP: on SMA5-CLJ4500N - network
print
:)
:)while 8.2 and earlier use the sender's email address in the same field:
:)
:)2507 04/01 ghudson@mit.edu Athena 8.3 alpha test<<The Athena 8.3 alpha
test
:)2508 04/02 miki@mit.edu about installing U60 without kbd and
monitors<<H
:)2509 04/02 tlai@mit.edu Working this summer? Next fall?<<Hi all, We'd
ap
:)2510 04/02 cuizhang@mit.edu Need help ASAP: on SMA5-CLJ4500N - network
print
:)
:) I don't really have a preference between these two formats, but
:)I'm curious as to whether this was an intentional change or not, and if
:)it's not, whether we want to revert to the earlier behavior.
:)
:)Garry
:)
