[3850] in testers

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: solaris 2.6 nroff segfault

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Whitson)
Mon Jul 27 19:03:23 1998

To: testers@MIT.EDU
From: Mike Whitson <mwhitson@MIT.EDU>
Date: 27 Jul 1998 19:03:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: Greg Hudson's message of Mon, 27 Jul 1998 18:59:25 EDT

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> Oops, sorry I didn't answer.  

Not a problem; I was just reminded of it when I tried to read that
manpage again. =)

> I built the appropriate Solaris sources, reproduced the problem.  It
> was too icky to figure out immediately, and now I've forgotten most
> of what I did find out.  I do remember that it didn't look much like
> a buffer overrun, but I don't have very high confidence in that.

If it's reproducible and rel-eng is hosed with more important work, is
this worth just handing off to Sun?  It *is* kind of their job to fix
bugs in their OS.  (Admittedly, if we do, it will probably be months
before we see any kind of fix out of them.)

-wrong mike

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post