[314] in testers
RT 6.4A: enscript (probably lpr)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri Dec 1 00:14:37 1989
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 89 23:58:12 -0500
From: Ilhamuddin Ahmed <ilham@ATHENA.MIT.EDU>
To: henry@GARP.MIT.EDU
Cc: testers@ATHENA.MIT.EDU, bug-palladium@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Henry Mensch's message of Thu, 30 Nov 89 22:26:43 -0500 <8912010326.AA01727@GARP.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: ilham@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 89 22:26:43 -0500
> From: henry@GARP.MIT.EDU (Henry Mensch)
> X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (6.5.6 6/30/89)
> apparently enscript invokes lpr with the -J option, and the
> palladiumised version doesn't like this:
> 52 garp ~ --> enscript -2rGqPnil-gateway /minos/source/README.probe
> lpr: illegal option -- J
> Usage: lpr : [-a start-time] [-b banner-type]
> [-c doc-comment] [-d doc-type] [-e event-list]
> [-l] [-m] [-o option-list] [-p profile]
> [-s sides] [-t doc-title] [-u pages-up]
> [-v] [-z] [-B] [-C job-comment] [-D]
> [-E end-sheet] [-H start-sheet] [-I sep-sheet
> [-P printer] [-R ret-time] [-S server]
> [-T job-title] [-# num-copies] [filename]
> the lpr manual page installed in 64a doesn't agree with this usage
> message.
> in addition, lpq is not in the standard path:
> 54 garp ~ --> lpq
> lpq: Command not found.
The RT 6.4A was not compiled with the LPREMULATE option, the vax side is
fine. Looks like things werent tracked over to minos properly.
- Ilham