[2007] in testers
RISC/6000
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (kcunning@Athena.MIT.EDU)
Thu Jun 4 11:12:13 1992
From: kcunning@Athena.MIT.EDU
To: testers@Athena.MIT.EDU
Cc: kcunning@Athena.MIT.EDU
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 92 11:11:45 EDT
In testers[1906], Richard noted that
> o References to RS/6000 should read RISC/6000 (RS/6000 is not an officially
> recognized name; I changed all of them in the release notes before, but
> more have crept in). [I noticed my name disappeared from the authors,
> not that I really care.]
Can anyone verify that RISC/6000 is the accepted term (and RS/6000 is not)?
I'm assuming Richard is right, but is there any way to check? (what do the
IBM manuals say in their copyright pages?)
Anyway, if RISC/6000 is correct, the System Release Notes should be revised
for that. (And before I pick them up for copying later today). Also, we
should start using the appropriate term in general.
Also, should Richard be listed as an author or not? Who makes that call?
(I don't have a clear sense how the Sys Notes get assembled...)
--Kevin
