| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 91 05:30:09 -0400 To: mar@MIT.EDU, testers@MIT.EDU, ckclark@MIT.EDU Cc: builder@MIT.EDU In-Reply-To: Calvin Clark's message of Mon, 5 Aug 91 18:21:09 -0400, From: Richard Basch <basch@MIT.EDU> > QUESTIONABLE: > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 21 Aug 1 02:53 /usr/lib/crontab -> /site/usr/lib/crontab > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 27 Aug 1 02:53 /usr/lib/crontab.local -> /site/usr/lib/crontab.local > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 8 Jul 16 13:43 /usr/clu -> /mit/clu > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 10 Jul 16 13:43 /usr/games -> /mit/games > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 15 Jul 16 17:28 /usr/bin/X10 -> /mit/x10/vaxbin > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 15 Jul 16 17:28 /usr/lib/X10 -> /mit/x10/vaxlib > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 6 Jul 16 13:43 patch -> /patch > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 12 Jul 16 17:28 /usr/lib/X -> /usr/lib/X10 > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root 6 Jul 19 09:03 /usr/new/mh.6.6 -> mh.6.6 The crontab links are meant to provide compatibility with 7.2 machines. These were intentional, given the structure of 7.2 machines. I thought /srvd/patch was supposed to point elsewhere so that we could provide a "patch" pack, if necessary. Remember, you cannot overmount with AFS system packs... (the link only exists on the srvd, not on the root). X10 - we can remove them, if management says we can break that compatibility. /usr/new/mh.6.6 -> mh.6.6: if this is really what it says, then it is a circular link, in which case it should be fixed. /usr/new/mh.6.6 should be a directory with compatibility links, and /usr/new/mh should be a symlink pointing to mh.6.6. -R
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |