[1382] in testers
previos message/ez
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Sun Dec 9 08:24:06 1990
From: yandros@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
To: testers@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 90 08:23:37 EST
In addition to the previous problem, ez in 7.2 garbled this line:
one should get one's queen out early.
a) if he did believe after it being explcitly stated stated that one
should, in fact
(with after .... stated being in italics)
what I see in the window is belive (italics from here) after it being explcitly
stated (garble, at least partly in italics. the italics appear to
end somewhere in the garble, and the next word is plain.)should, (note
the lack of the space
between the garble and the word should) in fact, ....
Also, when I tried to put the cursor caret on this line to correct a typo, the
caret dissapeers, even though the effect is the same, i.e., the caret function
properly, but is invisible.
When I put the cursor in the garble (it is visible after I moved it around some)
and hit `delete', the space it deletes is not in the garble but between the
words believe and did earlier in the sentence. When this happens, the garble
resolves itself into appropriate words, but when I replace the space between the
did and the believe, the garble returns.
Also, if I place the caret in the word should and back-arrow throught the garble
(and it goes all of the way through the garble, just like the garbled characters
were normal ones, without any weird spacing tricks), the caret goes (moving
backwards from should) to the trailing d of the word stated, after which another
back-arrow causes it to jump to the space between the initial d and the i in the
word did. (Note: the caret travelled all of the way throught the garble,
throught the space between the garble and the word stated, and then to the
middle of the word did.)
