[25788] in Source-Commits
Re: /svn/athena r25222 - trunk/debathena/scripts/installer
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (andrew m. boardman)
Tue Jul 12 21:03:46 2011
Message-Id: <201107130103.p6D13cnP012327@pony.mit.edu>
To: "Liz A. Denys" <lizdenys@MIT.EDU>
cc: Jonathan Reed <jdreed@MIT.EDU>, Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@MIT.EDU>,
"andrew m. boardman" <amb@MIT.EDU>, source-commits@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 08 Jul 2011 23:47:43 EDT."
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1107082346360.20981@echo>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:03:38 -0400
From: "andrew m. boardman" <amb@MIT.EDU>
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Jonathan Reed wrote:
> > [keep the apt_release fields independent]
>
> I like this idea as well.
I was under the impression (though from a discussion at release-team a
while ago) that there were some cases in which we were, and maybe still
are, just getting "development" or whatever and not also "proposed".
Are we sure that's not the case? I thought one of the explicit goals
here was to deal with hesiod nondeterminism, but if that's really not the
case then I'm happy to take only and exactly what hesiod lists.
In that case, I'm quite happy with approximately this from Geoff (though
the details of the grep are a bit off):
>> for i in bleeding development proposed; do
>> if echo "$hesclusters" | grep -fqx "$i"; then
>> hescluster=$i
>> break
>> fi
>> done
