[7284] in Release_7.7_team
Re: m56-129 ubuntu updates
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas Smith)
Tue Feb 15 10:59:01 2011
From: Thomas Smith <tjsmith@MIT.EDU>
To: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@mit.edu>
Cc: "hotline@mit.edu" <hotline@mit.edu>,
"acis-team@mit.edu" <acis-team@mit.edu>,
"release-team@mit.edu" <release-team@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <201102151551.p1FFpL6U029728@outgoing.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:58:54 -0500
Message-ID: <1297785534.12655.0.camel@QUICKSTATION-1.MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Jonathon,
That's very helpful.
Thank you,
Tommy
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 10:51 -0500, Jonathon Weiss wrote:
> Tommy,
>
> To see an exact list of the machines that we currently know to be broken
> you can go to the follwoing URL:
>
> https://clusters.mit.edu/cluster/cgi-bin/status.cgi?host=all&type=detail&servicestatustypes=16&hoststatustypes=3&serviceprops=42
>
> Any line that ends with "failed to configure unconfigured packages"
> definately has this problem. Machines that say "last checked for update
> at <time>" likely also have this problem. Things that end with
> "connection refused" probably have a different problem. Machines that
> don't appear on this list are fine, unless they a re completely off the
> net.
>
> As of rigth now, the clusters with a high percentage of broken machines are:
>
> 14N-0637 (I think the plan was to upgrade the 620s here)
> m1-115
> m37-318
> m38-370
> m56-129
> m66-080
>
> Note that if you worked on any of these this morning, there's a good
> chance the reporting is just being slow to catch up.
>
> There are single broken machines elsewhere. but the above clusters have
> a high percentage of machines with this problem.
>
> Jonathon
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Upon cluster tour noticed several more machines that did not take
> > updates.
> > Also,some students mentioned it as well.
> > So, redoing once again.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Thomas J. Smith
> > Athena-Team
> > Ditr-Team
> > Massachusetts Institute of Technology
