[6934] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Update cview architectures?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Garry P Zacheiss)
Mon Aug 30 10:55:07 2010

From: Garry P Zacheiss <zacheiss@MIT.EDU>
To: Jonathan D Reed <jdreed@mit.edu>
CC: ops <ops@mit.edu>, "release-team@MIT.EDU" <release-team@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:54:59 -0400
Message-ID: <42C8420E-505E-45E4-B542-B70761325C63@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <EBFA7F87-BEC8-4A48-A5F2-87180E507AEE@mit.edu>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Done:

[zacheiss@brad-majors] ~$ cview  
             --  Cluster status as of Mon Aug 30 10:53:54 2010:  --
          PC/LINUX  PC/LNX64  OTHER     TOTAL
CLUSTER   fre/tot   fre/tot   fre/tot   fre/tot
------------------------------------------------
BARKER5      -       4 / 4       -       4 / 4  
BARKER6      -       7 / 7       -       7 / 7  
M2-032       -       7 / 8       -       7 / 8  
M2-225       -       7 / 11      -       7 / 11 
M4-167       -       6 / 9       -       6 / 9  
M12-182      -      22 / 23      -      22 / 23 
HAYDEN       -       4 / 5       -       4 / 5  
M37-312      -       1 / 1       -       1 / 1  
M37-318      -       8 / 10      -       8 / 10 
M37-332      -       8 / 8       -       8 / 8  
M38-370      -       8 / 9       -       8 / 9  
M56-129      -      20 / 21      -      20 / 21 
M66-080      -      17 / 18      -      17 / 18 
E51-075      -       3 / 5       -       3 / 5  
ROTCH        -       5 / 6       -       5 / 6  
W20-575    1 / 1    73 / 84      -      74 / 85 
TOTALS     1 / 1   200 / 229   0 / 0   201 / 230


On Aug 27, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Jonathan Reed wrote:

> Oops, one previously unanticipated change of the switch to 64-bit is that cview now lists the machines as "Other".  Presumably, because busyd now returns strings like this:
> 
> 0barker-5-1.mit.edux86_64
> 
> Can we lose one or both of the Sun columns, and add a "PC/LNX64" (or similar) column for machines which report themselves as x86_64?
> 
> The other option would be to add x86_64 to the list of things considered "Linux", but it might be interesting to have separate columns for 32- and 64-bit in the short term.
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Jon
> 



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post