| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:43:02 -0400 From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU> To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> Cc: release-team@MIT.EDU Message-ID: <20060623064302.GU21897@multics.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1151044785.3769.19.camel@egyptian-gods.mit.edu> X-Spam-Score: 3.548 X-Spam-Level: *** (3.548) X-Spam-Flag: NO Thanks for the snappy reply. Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> wrote on Fri, 23 Jun 2006 at 02:39:45 -0400 in <1151044785.3769.19.camel@egyptian-gods.mit.edu>: > The reason for disabling ctrl-alt-backspace has nothing to do with > security; it's about the risk of losing your work to a misplaced thump > on the right side of the keyboard. Sorry, I had meant to address that. But I guess all I can say is that I find it really implausible that this actually happens to many people, each key being about 4" away from the other two. (Also, I think it would be a bad idea to ignore the security argument in deciding) > Ctrl-alt-F1 ctrl-alt-del still works; while it takes longer, we live > with that on Solaris (stop+a and boot) and it's okay. Well, in Solaris, at least in theory, one can type some PROM magic and Win. I agree I've been sloppy about keeping the magic up-to-date. I suppose it is a sign of something that I can't remember the last time someone came into the SIPB office and said, "My workstation has hung, I have critical unsaved work, can you help me?" Good night. --jhawk
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |