[584] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
Re: Enterprise Printing Delivery, Meeting Notes, 10/11/2000
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lynne E. Durland)
Wed Oct 11 20:59:23 2000
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001011205734.00b01d78@po12.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:58:57 -0400
To: Mary Ellen Bushnell <bushnell@MIT.EDU>, printdel@MIT.EDU
From: "Lynne E. Durland" <durland@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <v04020a04b60a7bb93d5c@[18.152.1.45]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=====================_771509==_.ALT"
--=====================_771509==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Mary Ellen,
You are an amazing and wonderful person. You captured the heart of the
matter even when you were not totally understanding all the sublties.......A+
Thank you
Lynne
At 05:06 PM 10/11/2000 -0400, Mary Ellen Bushnell wrote:
>Attending: Dave, Lynne, Rocklyn, MEB
>
>Today's meeting was prompted by issues raised by SMAzary and TRegan with
>regard to rolling out IPM service (for central printing) to the desktop.
>Susan's objection seems to focus on the notion that this is still mainframe
>based, even though it isn't. Theresa's objects to adding yet more software
>(client or printer driver) to the desktop.
>
>First we listed the options for submitting print jobs. For all options the
>user can view job status via the web browser. Zephyr could be made to tell
>the user that the print job had been received (?). In a mid-meeting
>teleconference between Dave and Theresa, Theresa pretty much dismissed the
>need for the Zephyr service. We then developed a chart of options for
>submitting print jobs to IPM with advantages and disadvantages.
>
>This chart reflects this morning's discussion. I think it could use more
>specifics.
>
>http://web.mit.edu/is/delivery/enterprint/submitoptions.html
--=====================_771509==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<html>
<font size=3>Mary Ellen, <br>
<br>
You are an amazing and wonderful person. You captured the heart of
the matter even when you were not totally understanding all the
sublties.......A+<br>
<br>
Thank you<br>
<br>
Lynne<br>
<br>
At 05:06 PM 10/11/2000 -0400, Mary Ellen Bushnell wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>Attending: Dave, Lynne, Rocklyn, MEB<br>
<br>
Today's meeting was prompted by issues raised by SMAzary and TRegan
with<br>
regard to rolling out IPM service (for central printing) to the
desktop.<br>
Susan's objection seems to focus on the notion that this is still
mainframe<br>
based, even though it isn't. Theresa's objects to adding yet more
software<br>
(client or printer driver) to the desktop.<br>
<br>
First we listed the options for submitting print jobs. For all options
the<br>
user can view job status via the web browser. Zephyr could be made to
tell<br>
the user that the print job had been received (?). In a mid-meeting<br>
teleconference between Dave and Theresa, Theresa pretty much dismissed
the<br>
need for the Zephyr service. We then developed a chart of options
for<br>
submitting print jobs to IPM with advantages and disadvantages.<br>
<br>
This chart reflects this morning's discussion. I think it could use
more<br>
specifics.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://web.mit.edu/is/delivery/enterprint/submitoptions.html" eudora="autourl">http://web.mit.edu/is/delivery/enterprint/submitoptions.html</a>
</font></blockquote><br>
</html>
--=====================_771509==_.ALT--
