[239] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
Re: Meeting to discuss tasks related to PrintDel
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rocklyn E. Clarke)
Sun May 21 13:24:36 2000
Resent-From: "David F. Lambert" <LAMBERT@MITVMA.MIT.Edu>
Resent-To: Enterprise Printing Delivery Project Team <printdel@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 19 May 00 14:41:21 EDT
From: "Rocklyn E. Clarke" <RCLARKE@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
To: "Roger A. Roach" <rar@MIT.EDU>, Karen Fortoul <Fortoul@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>,
"Peter B. Kelley" <Kelley@MIT.EDU>,
Dave Lambert <LAMBERT@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>,
Rachel Sage <Sage@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Cc: VM Systems Services Team <VM-SST@MITVMA.mit.edu>,
Lynne E Durland <durland@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <200005171748.NAA02436@rar.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <000519.145015.EDT.RCLARKE@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
FYI... -Dave
----------------------------Original message----------------------------
Hello,
Most of you are already aware of this, but I am sending it out for the record.
After fruitful conversations with Rachel, Karen, Jeff Banta (our IBM printer
sales rep), and some additional IBM staff, we have determined that it will
not be necessary for us to beta test the soon to be announced TCP/IP function
of IBM's PSF/VM product. The PSF/VM topic should remain on the agenda for our
meeting however, since we will need to discuss if and how to implement it
once it becomes generally available.
Rocklyn
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 17 May 2000 13:48:18 -0400 Roger Roach said:
>Folks,
>
>We had a good meeting today about the PrintDel effort, but it is obvious we
>need to come to some sort of conclusion regarding the tasks that are implied.
> I would like to ask that we meet as a group on Wednesday, 5/24, from 2-4 in
>W91-250. The tasks I see (we may add more) that need to get resolved are:
>
>1. Support of AIX
>2. Support of IPM
>3. 3827/3160 Migration
>4. PSF/VM
>
>For each of these, I would like to get
>
>An estimate of the level of effort (both startup and ongoing if the task
> continues).
>Possible names of candidates to do the work
>Possible time frames for the work to get done
>
>I recognize we may not be able to get all the answers in one meeting, so we
>may decide to give homework to determine answers and convene a second time.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Roger
>
>
