[2111] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
Re: Outcome from Tonight's Meeting
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theresa M Regan)
Wed Dec 19 05:03:49 2001
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20011219043949.02203d90@hesiod>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 05:01:38 -0500
To: David F Lambert <LAMBERT@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>, Bob Ferrara <rferrara@MIT.EDU>
From: Theresa M Regan <tregan@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Enterprise Printing Delivery Project Team <printdel@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <200112190249.VAA18531@fort-point-station.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Hi Dave and Bob,
Although I agree that the matrix represents the matrix from the whiteboard,
I am still uncomfortable that I understand its implications.
Example: Hidden printer... you note EP1; we also mentioned FSS1
What is meant by "hidden printer"? It was suggested that it would not
display on the web page. I am uncomfortable with that anomaly and while
chatting last evening was trying to understand the various pieces to reach
a common understanding.
If the description states "SAP", does that mean that we are testing the
output, such that, if it does originate from SAP, it will rejected? Or, is
the description merely a description? Example: when testing a queue
marked SAP, if a print job from an Athena prompt or elsewhere is sent,
would it be rejected?
It is my understanding as we left last night's meeting, we would ponder the
matrix to be sure that we understand it and meet again to discuss it and
reach common closure. Tentatively, it was suggested that may be Friday
morning's meeting.
Thanks,
Theresa
At 09:35 PM 12/18/2001 -0500, David F Lambert wrote:
>Bob & Theresa,
>
>Please let me know if the matrix below does NOT represent our board
>work tonight.
>
>Printdel,
>
>I know you're seeing this blind for the first time. However, please
>review the following matrix. Does it look reasonable given our stated
>goals? How difficult would it be to implement? I will touch bases
>with each of you by phone tomorrow. There have been NO decisions or
>commitments of any kind.
>
>
>
> queue klp IPM auth bldg-rm &
> type req'd list req'd Cost Obj req'd
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>| restricted | y | y | n |
>| non-SAP | | | |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>| general use | n* | n | y |
>| from SAP | | | |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>| SAP G/L | n* | y | n |
>| | | | |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>| general use | y | n | y |
>| non-SAP | | | |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>| hidden (EP1) | n | n | n |
>| | | | |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>* denotes authentication mechanism using existing SAP implementation
