[1990] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: EP1

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Garry Zacheiss)
Wed Dec 5 19:23:25 2001

Message-Id: <200112060023.TAA25984@brad-majors.mit.edu>
To: Theresa M Regan <tregan@MIT.EDU>
cc: "Huxley, Bil" <huxley@MIT.EDU>, Cana Lynn McCoy <cana@MIT.EDU>,
        hesreq@MIT.EDU, printdel@MIT.EDU, caotech@MIT.EDU, R3-Print@MIT.EDU,
        kelley@MIT.EDU, "Lynne E. Durland" <durland@MIT.EDU>, ops@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:18:54 EST."
             <5.0.2.1.2.20011205130722.02837080@hesiod> 
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 19:23:22 -0500
From: Garry Zacheiss <zacheiss@MIT.EDU>

>> It is my understanding that the MOIRA feed to windsurf would be expanded
>> to include the IPM servers, as well.  I believe, it would simplify
>> people's understanding of what happens to administrative print queues
>> entered into MOIRA if they follow the current, daily process from MOIRA
>> to windsurf.

   We've already had this discussion, and I have the old email to prove
it. :-)

   The last time this came up, what we agreed on was this:

   1.)Queues on pillage/plunder that would be SAP queues would
	     be created in moira as type "SAP", and would be in 
	     the file sent to windsurf.

   2.)We would *not* send windsurf all queues on pillage/plunder.

This is detailed in a message I sent, included below.

Is it the case that the conditions I specified then are still
sufficient, and we just haven't been following this procedure, or that
we now no longer wish to follow this process?G

[53020] daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lynne E. Durland)  Ops_Projects  12/23/00 09:04 (90 lines)
Subject: Re: pillage/plunder info from moira to asst
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001223090207.00b3be28@po12.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 09:02:26 -0500
To: Garry Zacheiss <zacheiss@mit.edu>
From: "Lynne E. Durland" <durland@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Garry Zacheiss <zacheiss@mit.edu>, "Peter B. Kelley" <kelley@mit.edu>,
        ops@mit.edu, printdel@mit.edu, asst@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200012222027.PAA00885@hodge-podge.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="=====================_1225111==_.ALT"

--=====================_1225111==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Thanks Garry,

This sounds good to me.

Lynne

At 03:27 PM 12/22/2000 -0500, Garry Zacheiss wrote:
>         Ok, I've made those changes. The queue "retipm" is now type SAP
>in moira, and it and its duplex queue are the only queues on
>pillage/plunder in the file that will be generated and shipped to
>fleagle.
>
>         I've left admissions and w91-109-blahblahblah in moira as type
>'IPM' for now; this doesn't actually have any significance anymore, but
>I'd like to leave myself a hook for any future expansion and
>development.
>
>         Ops: I've checked in a change to sapprint.gen reverting the
>previous revision, and installed it on the moira server.
>
>         hesreq folk: Slight modification to what was said previously:
> From now on, if an queue on pillage/plunder is to be in SAP, the mail
>sent to hesreq should specify that, and should be entered in moira as
>type 'SAP'.  Other queues on pillage/plunder should be type 'IPM'.
>
>         Bug me if you have questions.
>
>Garry

--[53020]-- (pref = [53009])


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post