[1986] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
Re: EP1
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theresa M Regan)
Wed Dec 5 13:18:59 2001
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20011205130722.02837080@hesiod>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:18:54 -0500
To: "Huxley, Bil" <huxley@MIT.EDU>, Cana Lynn McCoy <cana@MIT.EDU>
From: Theresa M Regan <tregan@MIT.EDU>
Cc: <hesreq@MIT.EDU>, <printdel@MIT.EDU>, <caotech@MIT.EDU>,
<R3-Print@MIT.EDU>, kelley@MIT.EDU,
"Lynne E. Durland" <durland@MIT.EDU>,
"Lynne E. Durland" <durland@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20011205124006.038d4298@po9.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Hi Bil and Cana,
It is my understanding that the MOIRA feed to windsurf would be expanded to
include the IPM servers, as well. I believe, it would simplify people's
understanding of what happens to administrative print queues entered into
MOIRA if they follow the current, daily process from MOIRA to windsurf.
Once I have a chance to answer the Print Delivery's open inquiry about
"who" should have access to IPM queues, this process may become even more
important. Within the print queue definition in MOIRA, there is an access
restrict list. Several of us believe that requiring IPM queue definitions
to have a corresponding access restrict list will help address this open
and critical question.
I promise to draft a response by Friday which will address the current open
e-mails and highlight that by noting administrative queues within MOIRA and
designating them for Arbor-Eater, Fiber, Pillage or Plunder and forwarding
their critical characteristics along to windsurf will hopefully, streamline
the process and create common understandings about process and ease problem
resolution.
Thanks,
Theresa
At 12:48 PM 12/5/2001 -0500, Huxley, Bil wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'd like to respectfully suggest that the algorithm for choosing what
>Moira entries need to be sent to ASST for SAP-Printcap probably should be
>revised. I don't think Lynne's process needs to be modified. So I
>suggest that all Pillage & Plunder entries be propagated along with all
>Arbor-Eater & Fiber entries and whatever is on the +/exception list.
>
>What do others think?
> Bil
>
>At 12/5/2001 12:06 PM -0500, Lynne E. Durland wrote:
>>Cana,
>>
>>This change did not propagate over to the SAP printcap. What
>>could/should I have done differently in the request to make this change
>>go over to SAP?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Lynne
>>
>>At 02:13 PM 12/4/2001, Cana Lynn McCoy wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Lynne E. Durland wrote:
>>>
>>> > Please change the entry for ep1 and ep12 to point to pillage.mit.edu.
>>> >
>>> > This will still be an SAP related printer.
>>>
>>>I have made this change. It will propagate by 4:30pm this afternoon.
>>>
>>>Cana McCoy
>>>Athena Server Operations
>>
>>Lynne E. Durland
>>Information Systems
>>Database Services
>>W91-109
>>O: 617-258-5857
>>C: 617-293-8091
>>H: KB1FEM
>>
>>"When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so
>>long at the closed door that we do not see the one which has been opened
>>for us."
>>
>> --Helen Keller
>
