[1885] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
Re: Case 237897
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David F Lambert)
Tue Nov 6 15:40:29 2001
Message-Id: <200111062040.PAA26166@pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 01 15:36:45 EST
From: David F Lambert <LAMBERT@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
To: "Peter B. Kelley" <kelley@MIT.EDU>
cc: Enterprise Printing Delivery Project Team <printdel@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 06 Nov 2001 09:43:01 -0500
Thanks much for the update and request for fast shipping, Pete.
I'll let you know when I get the request from CAO to print GL.
-Dave
On Tue, 06 Nov 2001 09:43:01 -0500 Pete said:
>The procurement process for additional disk storage has been longer than
>expected. The specific drives that we are using had been 'end-of-lifed' by
>IBM and were not available on the primary market. Secondary market sources
>were used and the specific drives were searched for, located, and
>ordered. I double checked with Procurement yesterday and there were no
>hangups there. I'll followup with the vendor to get a delivery date. We
>had ordered quantity 10 to cover both the production and the test/dev
>servers which may be the hangup. I'll request a short-ship so that we can
>quickly to the production machine.
>
>Case 233645 (09/19/01 - 10/09/01) contains original correspondence about
>the need for additional space and the discussion about how to determine
>what the real space requirements should be.
>
>Case 237897 (10/11/01 - open) contains the results of that analysis and the
>specific requirements.
>
>--Pete
>
>
>
>At 08:53 AM 11/5/2001 +0000, asst-help@MIT.EDU wrote:
>>Your message was appended to case number 237897 in our database.
>>Please use the subject line above for future replies
>>connected with this case.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>Date: Mon, 05 Nov 01 08:43:59 EST
>>To: asst-help@MIT.EDU
>>From: David F Lambert <LAMBERT@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>>Cc: Enterprise Printing Delivery Project Team <printdel@MIT.EDU>
>>Subject: Re: Case 237897
>>
>>
>>ASSTers,
>>
>>Please note that cases 233645 & 237897 are really the same issue.
>>
>>It's been nearly four weeks since our formal request for additional
>>disk was requested. However, we've yet to receive any written
>>acknowledgment of this request, or received any written update.
>>
>>We expect CAO will request we use IPM to print the October GL statements
>>within the next few days. We canNOT satisfy this request without the
>>additional requested disk. What is the current status of the request?
>>When will the additional disks be installed and available for use?
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>-Dave (for the Printdel Team)
>
>