[1868] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
Re: Fwd: Updated Maintenance Agreement
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rocklyn E. Clarke)
Thu Nov 1 12:21:54 2001
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p05010408b8073457c3b1@[192.168.1.101]>
In-Reply-To: <p04320401b7d6af9cd81e@[18.18.1.187]>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:21:50 -0500
To: Kenneth Higgins <khiggins@MIT.EDU>
From: "Rocklyn E. Clarke" <rclarke@MIT.EDU>
Cc: paheff@MIT.EDU, rar@MIT.EDU, kelley@MIT.EDU, rferrara@MIT.EDU,
Enterprise Printing Delivery Team <PRINTDEL@MIT.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Hi Ken,
It's been a while now. Has the InfoPrint Manager custom web
interface maintenance agreement been sent to IBM yet? If so, have
they signed it, and is it in effect?
Rocklyn
At 6:12 PM -0400 9/25/01, Kenneth Higgins wrote:
>Hi Rocklyn,
>
>The requisition was dropped off in Procurement this afternoon. The charge
>is being made against the Enterprise Software Maintenance cost object 1779601
>in the OCP space. We will be moving the budgeted software maintenance G/L in
>1644400 Delivery Projects to the OCP cost object which is slightly
>less (approx. $1k)
>than the new agreement figure.
>Ken
>
>>Hi Paul and Ken,
>>
>>I have indeed reviewed and approved this maintenance agreement.
>>Please use the following IBM Customer Number:
>>
>> 5561000
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Rocklyn
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>At 1:25 PM -0400 9/21/01, Paul Heffernan wrote:
>>>Ken,
>>>
>>>I looked this over and felt it mainly fell in Procurement space since it is
>>>primarily a services contract. Cliff Peacock will be out of the office for
>>>about a week so Tony Flaherty will look at it. There is a reference to an
>>>agreement with an MIT Customer number but IBM hasn't provided the number.
>>>That should be filled in so we know this is referencing the correct
>>>agreement with an authorized MIT signature. Otherwise the questions are 1)
>>>has Rocklyn reviewed and approved? and 2) can Procurement approve? I
>>>believe this would be signed by Procurement and not Intellectual Property.
>>>
>>>I'm copying Tony on this message and suggest you get the requisition over
>>>to him. Let me know if I can help with the process of getting this done.
>>>
>>>Regards, Paul
>>>
>>>>Paul FYI per our conversation
>>>>
>>>>>Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:01:37 -0400
>>>>>To: "Higgins, Kenneth" <khiggins@mit.edu>
>>>>>From: "Rocklyn E. Clarke" <rclarke@MIT.EDU>
>>>>>Subject: Fwd: Updated Maintenance Agreement
>>>>>Cc: "Ferrara, Robert V" <rferrara@mit.edu>,
>>>>> Enterprise Printing Delivery Team <PRINTDEL@mit.edu>
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi Ken,
>>>>>
>>>>>Here is the revised IBM Maintenance Agreement for the custom
>>>>>InfoPrint Manager web interface that they wrote for us. It seems
>>>>>that the original version that I sent you was misleading, but I now
>>>>>understand how they plan to charge us. The PO needs to provide for
>>>>>$3750 up front and up to $9675 (45 hours @ $215/hour) for service
>>>>>requests on an "as used" basis. Thus the total authorization for
>>>>>the PO should indeed be the $13,425 amount that appears in Section
>>>>>9. Please let me know if you have any questions.
>>>>>
>>>>>Rocklyn
>>>>>
