[1800] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
Re: Printer served served from both IPM and APS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David M. Rosenberg)
Fri Oct 19 19:00:06 2001
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p05100304b7f65d2cabb7@[18.18.0.106]>
In-Reply-To: <200110170912.FAA10909@melbourne-city-street.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:59:10 -0400
To: Theresa M Regan <tregan@MIT.EDU>
From: "David M. Rosenberg" <Rosenberg@MIT.EDU>
Cc: debbie@MIT.EDU, mprudden@MIT.EDU, r3-print@MIT.EDU, printdel@MIT.EDU,
ppage@MIT.EDU, msprague@MIT.EDU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 5:16 AM -0400 on 10/17/01, Theresa M Regan wrote (in a message with the
subject "Re: PI1P and PI1T queues; GLTW"):
>David, lastly, there is antiquated decision that a "printer" only be
>associated with one print server. Is the timing such that RET can be
>served from IPM or APS, but, not both?
Theresa,
We still need (or at least, are significantly aided by having) a Postscript
printer on the second floor that is accessible from SAP through InfoPrint
Manager. But there is no need that a single printer be accessible both via
InfoPrint Manager and Athena Print Services. Paul Page suggested that we
might be able to take one of the printers that we were going to replace,
and instead of getting rid of it, we could make it so that it is served
through InfoPrint Manager (and not Athena Print Services). If we did that,
RET would not need to be served by InfoPrint Manager.
If that arrangement would be more convenient for you, let me know and we'll
try to set up the old printer to be served by InfoPrint Manager and request
that RET no longer be served by InfoPrint Manager.
--
/David M. Rosenberg rosenberg@mit.edu 1-617-253-8054
