[163] in Enterprise Print Delivery Team
Re: GartnerGroup Check-in & Public Access to Current Costs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David F. Lambert)
Sun Apr 2 13:27:10 2000
Message-Id: <10004021728.AA13434@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 00 13:06:50 EDT
From: "David F. Lambert" <LAMBERT@mitvma.mit.edu>
To: Kenneth Bruggeman <kiplb@MIT.EDU>
Cc: Enterprise Printing Delivery Project Team <printdel@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:45:17 -0500
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:45:17 -0500 Kip said:
>>Two quick items, gang.
>>
>>Do the techies feel any need to have another conference call with
>>GartnerGroup?
>>
>>Do the BM folks feel comfortable adding the current draft of the
>>current printing costs to our Project Notebook (understanding
>>it's a draft and still incomplete)?
>>
>>-Dave
>Dave
>I would feel comfortable using the draft if it reflects the changes we made
>to it on Monday at our meeting. Can I submit my changes Monday AM? I want
>to take some vacation time next week (maybe Tues, Weds, & Fri) and I have
>been spending this week putting out old fires and trying to get ahead of
>things.
>
>Kip
Sure, Kip. If you can squeak in the updates with Ceci this week between
your vacation days that would be great. Besides "the numbers & $s", we'll
want some text describing the current services - much of this material
already exists. With Ceci's okay, the current status report states we'll
complete the doucmentation of the existing services within the next
two weeks. We'll stamp it all as DRAFT work. It would be nice if you
and Ceci would draft a list of the topics to be described for the team's
review & input - headers might include stuff like:
- overall central printing service description - offerings & omissions
- Support services provided
- customer base, type of work,
- general budget info; EFT, $s, funding sources, renewal straegy
- business continuity
- maybe something around Integration issues (provided by the technical
team members)
- stock management
I'm hoping the above list will get you & Cecilia thinking about firming
up an outline for the BM documentation. Cecilia has an additional goal
of producing a reusable framework for other I/T business modeling work -
this is good thing!
-Dave
