[88] in peace2
Returned mail: Remote protocol error
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Tue Feb 22 17:49:58 2000
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 00 17:48:35 EST
From: MAILER-DAEMON@MIT.EDU (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Message-Id: <10002222248.AA20382@MIT.EDU>
To: <peace-list@MIT.EDU>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
>>> MAIL From:<peace-list@MIT.EDU>
<<< 554 Transaction failed
451 <kippers57@hotmail.com>... reply: read error
451 <kippers57@hotmail.com>... reply: read error
554 <kippers57@hotmail.com>... Remote protocol error: Bad file number
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: from GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
id AA20378; Tue, 22 Feb 00 17:48:35 EST
Received: from melbourne-city-street.MIT.EDU (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU [18.69.0.45])
by grand-central-station.MIT.EDU (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA17130;
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:48:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from m56-129-8.mit.edu (M56-129-8.MIT.EDU [18.56.0.37])
by melbourne-city-street.MIT.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA28190;
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:48:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from karens@localhost) by m56-129-8.mit.edu (8.9.3)
id RAA08440; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:48:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200002222248.RAA08440@m56-129-8.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Nicole Hennig <nic@hennigweb.com>
Cc: Karen Sachs <karens@MIT.EDU>, peace-list@MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: thehungersite
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:32:41 EST."
<v04210101b4d83cda04ee@[209.6.192.183]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:48:25 -0500
From: Karen Sachs <karens@MIT.EDU>
I originally sent out the notice about the hungersite but I want to stress
that I completely agree with Nicole. However, the fact that I do not see this
as the solution or even a part of the solution does not detract from the fact
that for 2 seconds of my time I can have these nasty companies donate a little
bit a day, and, importantly, I am not helping them. The fact that I log into
the site and click on the button does not make me patronize these companies
anymore than I otherwise would. (i.e. not at all)
Karen
