[876] in peace2
Caltech-MIT team on Voting Technology
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Felix AuYeung)
Tue Jul 17 12:10:50 2001
From: "Felix AuYeung" <humanpotential@care2.com>
Message-Id: <A8AC2DB4DCA75D1168D50005B80E61C3@humanpotential.care2.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:12:09 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
To: peace-list@mit.edu
CC: wauyeung@stanford.edu, jsyang@alum.mit.edu, matthew_forney@timeasia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Caltech-MIT team finds 4-6 million votes lost in 2000 election; Nationwide reforms outlined in report
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2001/voting2.html
JULY 16, 2001
Four to six million votes, a number which is double the population of Chicago, were lost in the 2000 presidential election due to
problems with ballots, equipment, registration or at the polling place, according to a joint analysis by experts at the California Institute
of Technology and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The report, sponsored by the Carnegie Corporation, is a non-partisan examination of the existing voting process, and the first
comprehensive study of voting technology to be completed in the wake of the 2000 Presidential election.
In their introduction to the report, Caltech President David Baltimore and MIT President Charles M. Vest, note: "In the last election,
Americans learned that at the heart of their democratic process, their 'can-do' spirit has 'make-do' technology as its central element.
For many years, we have 'made do' with this deeply flawed system, but we now know how poorly these systems function. Until every
effort has been made to insure that each vote will be counted, we will have legitimate concerns about embarking on another
presidential election."
The team of 10 computer scientists, mechanical engineers and political scientists were appointed by the presidents of the nation's
most prestigious scientific universities after the 2000 presidential election to evaluate the state of American voting systems. Their
100-page report, entitled "Voting: What Is, What Could Be," outlines the magnitude of problems with voting equipment, and offers a
blueprint for fixing them before the next presidential election.
The report recommends two immediate reforms that could reduce lost votes by 50 percent in 2004: installing voting machines that
scan paper ballots at the precinct and making voter registration data available at polling places.
Other key findings include:
Optical scanning is the most reliable method of voting. Both punch cards and lever machines should be done away with.
Internet voting is not a near-term solution because of the threat of computer hacking.
Polling places should be equipped with laptops to provide instant access to all county or state voter registration information. This will
help alleviate the problem of eligible voters being turned away on election day.
"Provisional ballots" should be used when registration questions arise.
Early voting should replace absentee ballots on demand.
A National Elections Research Lab or program should be created to "foster the development of better voting equipment and voting
systems."
The report also proposes a new modular voting architecture that could serve as a model for future voting technology, one that would
offer greater opportunity for innovation in ballot design and security.
"The Voting Technology Project is part of a larger effort currently underway -- involving many dedicated election officials, researchers,
and policy makers -- to restore confidence in our election system," commented Steve Ansolabehere, a professor of political science
who headed up the MIT team. "We are hopeful that the report will become a valuable resource, and that it will help to bring about real
change in the near future."
http://web.mit.edu/voting/
****
(doesn't take a team of "rocket scientists" to figure out the election was sketchy, but it helps when the schools come out with critism
and alternatives, esp. since the current administration likes to make the "no sound science" argument. this team of very legitimate
and upright scholars formed as a response the florida fraud, a very good way to express their concerns, while other people pursue
other means concurrently. ~FAY)
"She cannot see in any dream a time where a man holds a
patent to a living seed, or animals are factories, or
people are enslaved to money, or water belongs to a
stockholder..." ~Paul Hawken~
http://www.care2.com - Get your Free e-mail account that helps save Wildlife!
