[20] in peace2

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: WTO movement and peace

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karen Sachs)
Fri Jan 14 12:05:15 2000

Message-Id: <200001141705.MAA27606@m56-129-21.mit.edu>
To: jennifer lewey <jlewey@brandeis.edu>
cc: peace2@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2000 00:42:28 EST."
             <387EB744.4F9351AF@brandeis.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 12:05:06 -0500
From: Karen Sachs <karens@MIT.EDU>

hi jennifer-

i have no knowledge of economics, but it is clear to me that the problem with 
the wto is NOT that it attmepts globalization.  it does not.  it attempts to 
structure world trade in such a way that would best serve huge corporations, 
and "best serve" for them translates into no concern for worker's or 
childern's rights, no concern for the environment.

this is why their agreements had to be made behind closed doors.

i see it as american rich boys saying hey, why shouldn't we hook up not only 
with each other, but with all the other rich boys in the world-  then we'll 
make even more millions.

thw wto agreements have a "profit first" philosophy (obviously, since it's 
structured by people serving these huge corporations), and so they crush human 
and environmental rights.

a different wto that adresses world trade while also addressing humanitary 
issues could be a trully wonderful and unifying thing, a true attempt at 
globalization.

out of seattle comes a slightly different (though related) issue-  one of 
centrallization of power and the regard for citizen's rights in america.  at 
the meeting last night, the man sitting stage left (whose name i missed), 
refering to the "disappearance" of one of the speakers, said something to the 
effect of: in another country, this man's disappearance would have been for 
good.

how strongly we hold to the notion of our country being inherently different 
from the others!  after witnessing unprovoked officers of the law brutillizing 
unprotected people, officers who will never be brought to justice, people who 
may suffer permanent damage... can we still believe that in our country human 
rights are somehow protected?

if people are arrested and beaten in the jails, and all that interests the 
government is the pr, how far away are we from "disappearances"?

wake up and smell the stench of the government.  as long as the masses don't 
know, they do what they choose.

and where's the media in all of this?  busy watching a few people break 
windows.

i recently read Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle", describing the horrors of 
industrial giants' complete disregard for anything but profit, and the 
horrible resulting squalor of the workers' lives.  one hundred years later, we 
feel that real progress has been made.  meanwhile the industrial giants are 
there, working hard for a great leap backwards.

on this optimistic note, i highly recommend to you howard zin's "a people's 
history of the US" and "you can't stay neutral on a moving train", also by zin.

as long as people care and are willing to sacrifice, i believe things can 
change in the right direction.

hats off to the three who came and spoke to us last night, and to all the 
thousands who were with them.

karen


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post