[1592] in peace2

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[Fidel's Speech at Monterrey]

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Laura Doughty)
Tue Mar 26 11:37:12 2002

Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:34:44 -0500
Message-Id: <200203261634.g2QGYir14624@mgm.mit.edu>
From: Laura Doughty <laura@mgm.mit.edu>
To: peace-announce@MIT.EDU

------- Start of forwarded message -------

Subject: Re: Fidel's Speech at Monterrey
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:13:41 

 Some heads of states in Monterrey issued protests of a sort of the
 situation faced by Third World countries, "But fiercest of all was
 Fidel Castro of Cuba," the New York Times reported, "dressed in
 battle fatigues, whose short but scathing critique of the world
 powers assembled before him led the American contingent to walk out
 of the closed conference hall."
 
 Speech by Fidel Castro, president of the Republic of Cuba, at the
 International Conference on Financing for Development. Monterrey,
 March 21, 2002

 Excellencies:
  
 Not everyone here will share my thoughts. Still, I will respectfully
 say what I think.  The existing world economic order constitutes a
 system of plundering and exploitation like no other in history. Thus,
 the peoples believe less and less in statements and promises. The
 prestige of the international financial institutions rates less than
 zero. The world economy is today a huge casino.Recent analyses
 indicate that for every dollar that goes into trade, over one hundred
 end up in speculative operations completely disconnected from the
 real economy.  As a result of this economic order, over 75 percent of
 the world population lives in underdevelopment, and extreme poverty
 has already reached 1.2 billion people in the Third World. So, far
 from narrowing, the gap is widening. The revenue of the richest
 nations, that in 1960 was 37 times larger than that of the poorest,
 is now 74 times larger. The situation has reached such extremes that
 the assets of the three wealthiest persons in the world amount to the
 GDP of the 48 poorest countries combined. The number of people
 actually starving was 826 million in the year 2001. There are at the
 moment 854 million illiterate adults while 325 million children do
 not attend school. There are 2 billion people who have no access to
 low cost medications and 2.4 billion lack basic sanitation
 conditions. No less than 11 million children under the age of 5
 perish every year from preventable causes while half a million go
 blind for lack of vitamin A. The life span of the population in the
 developed world is 30 years higher than that of people living in
 Sub-Saharan Africa. A true genocide!
 
 The poor countries should not be blamed for this tragedy. They
 neither conquered nor plundered entire continents for centuries; they
 did not establish colonialism, or re-establish slavery; and, modern
 imperialism is not of their making. Actually, they have been its
 victims. Therefore, the main responsibility for financing their
 development lies with those states that, for obvious historical
 reasons, enjoy today the benefits of those atrocities. The rich world
 should condone their foreign debt and grant them fresh soft credits
 to finance their development. The traditional offers of assistance,
 always scant and often ridiculous, are either inadequate or
 unfulfilled. For a true and sustainable economic and social
 development to take place much more is required than is usually
 admitted. Measures as those suggested by the late James Tobin to
 curtail the irrepressible flow of currency speculation-albeit it was
 not his idea to foster development-would perhaps be the only ones
 capable of generating enough funds, which in the hands of the UN
 agencies and not of awful institutions like the IMF, could supply
 direct development assistance with a democratic participation of all
 countries and without the need to sacrifice the independence and
 sovereignty of the peoples.
 
 The Consensus draft, which the masters of the world are imposing on
 this conference, intends that we accept humiliating, conditioned and
 interfering alms. Everything created since Bretton Woods until today
 should be reconsidered. A farsighted vision was then missing, thus,
 the privileges and interests of the most powerful prevailed. In the
 face of the deep present crisis, a still worse future is offered
 where the economic, social and ecological tragedy of an increasingly
 ungovernable world would never be resolved and where the number of the
 poor and the starving would grow higher, as if a large part of
 humanity were doomed. It is high time for statesmen and politicians
 to calmly reflect on this. The belief that a social and economic
 order that has proven to be unsustainable can be forcibly imposed is
 really senseless.  As I have said before, the ever more sophisticated
 weapons piling up in the arsenals of the wealthiest and the mightiest
 can kill the illiterate, the ill, the poor and the hungry but they
 cannot kill ignorance, illnesses, poverty or hunger. It should
 definitely be said:"Farewell to arms."

 Something must be done to save Humanity!  
 A better world is possible! 
 Thank you.
------- End of forwarded message -------



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post