[1088] in peace2

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

No subject found in mail header

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anton F Van Der Ven)
Sat Oct 6 23:38:54 2001

Message-Id: <200110070338.XAA21171@m33-202-11.mit.edu>
To: peace-list@MIT.EDU, greens-announce@MIT.EDU, mitai-announce@MIT.EDU,
        utr@MIT.EDU, anti-hate@MIT.EDU, pro-choice@MIT.EDU,
        safe-request@MIT.EDU, africans@MIT.EDU, msa-ec@MIT.EDU,
        sangam-request@MIT.EDU, gwg@MIT.EDU, wphys-soc@MIT.EDU
cc: peace-women@MIT.EDU, pugwash@MIT.EDU, stop@MIT.EDU, save@MIT.EDU,
        mit-ult@MIT.EDU, gamit@MIT.EDU, sweatshop@MIT.EDU,
        rape-orientation@MIT.EDU, gsc-representatives@MIT.EDU,
        gsc-officers@MIT.EDU, mdonovan@MIT.EDU
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2001 23:38:28 -0400
From: Anton F Van Der Ven <avdv@MIT.EDU>

I apologize for sending this to many groups, but this is a very important issue.




                              URGENT ACTION REQUESTED

              MIT employee suspended and facing dismissal for voicing 
         concerns about a multinational corporation's human rights record.

Write letters to protect speech at MIT !!

1) Write to President Vest and Chancelor Clay *respectfully* urging them to look 
   into this very serious matter. 

2) Talk to your professors and encourage them to write or call President Vest and 
   and Chancellor Clay.

3) Write to MIT Social Justice Cooperative at peace-keepers@mit.edu to get involved.

Details are given below. Forward this around, inside and outside of MIT. 
More information also at: http://web.mit.edu/justice/www/acad_free.html
_____________________________________________________________________________________


On thursday evening, a group of ethically concerned students attended a
Shell Recruiting event in order to shed light on Shell's history in Nigeria. 
The concerned students distributed flyers and asked questions to recruiters about 
this history. 

An MIT employee, who works in the building where the recruiting event was 
held, heard about the student's plans 30 minutes before it started and decided 
to join in. The employee, an administrative assistant, showed up after work 
around 6:00 pm, and helped pass out fliers made by the students (see the flyer 
at http:/mit.edu/aram/Public/shell/why-shell.pdf and other Shell links at 
http://mit.edu/aram/Public/shell). While the Shell representatives 
were discussing Shell's policies on environmentalism and social responsibility, 
the MIT employee asked a question about Shell's role in pollution and human 
rights abuses in Nigeria. Neither the MIT employee nor the concerned students 
present at the recruiting event were disruptive and their questions were posed 
in a respectful and polite manner. 

The next day, the said MIT employee received a suspension notice which 
claimed that he: 

     "... passed out an inappropriate flyer against Shell Inc. 
     on Thursday evening at a Chemical Engineering Graduate recruitment 
     event lead by representatives of Shell Inc. Although document 
     dissemination is a type of freedom of speech, the nature of what you 
     passed out was inappropriate for an MIT employee ... as a result 
     of your conduct last evening, you are being placed on a temporary 
     suspension ... This suspension is immediate as of 5pm today, 
     Friday October 5, 2001 ... the outcome will either lead to 
     reinstatement of your appointment with BPEC/DMA or full 
     dismissal." 
          
The employee was ordered to surrender his keys, VIP card and MIT ID card 
as well as disclose passwords to his MIT e-mail account, desktop, etc. 

Apparently, the Chem E. department told the suspended employee's supervisor 
that he was considered a Chem E. "representative" since he works in the 
building and was known by Chem E. people. In fact, it seems that the 
MIT employee does not work for the Chem E. department, but for the 
Dupont-MIT alliance (which has Chem E. professors in it, but is not under 
the Chem E. department's authority).

It seems that members of the Chemical Engineering department have difficulty 
understanding the concept of free speech. The crucial decision makers of 
this case in Chem E. are fine with free speech as long as it is speech they 
agree with. MIT is a university, an institution of learning in which free and 
open debate is essential to its normal functioning. If merely questioning 
a corporation is prohibited on campus by MIT staff because that corporation 
gives money to MIT, we might as well stop calling MIT a university. 

The actions against the MIT employee are a form of harrassment towards the 
employee specifically and a very powerful form of intimidation to all 
other MIT employees who will effectively be silenced from expressing their 
views (even in off hours) because they fear losing their job. This 
suspension sets a very disturbing precedent that will stifle free and open 
discussion on campus of most issues. It is also a blatant abuse 
of power by certain members of the MIT community that cannot be 
tolerated. Immediate action must be taken by the MIT community and 
the administration to rectify the situation. 

Notes: 

(1) Recruiting events are information sessions to educate MIT students 
about a particular company. While Shell spent much time talking about 
its initiatives on environmental policy and social responsibility, it 
systematically avoided educating people at the event about its well 
documented role in environmental pollution and human rights abuses. Since 
the event is an educational occasion, MIT students and any other member 
of the MIT community have the full right, in fact are obligated, for the 
sake of balance, to fill in gaps in information that Shell 
representatives systematically left out. What better place to do it 
than at a meeting where Shell representatives are present to defend 
the company's record ? 

(2) Although the chemical engineering department claims they sponsored 
the event, this is not mentioned on any of the flyers advertising the 
event. One flyer was from Shell with no reference to MIT and another 
flyer mentioned the MIT Career Services Office. The guidelines are very 
clear on this. If an event is sponsored by several groups or departments, 
they must all be listed on the event's flyers. If a group is not listed 
as a co-sponsor on any of the flyers, they cannot claim that they 
co-sponsored the event.  



__________________________________________________________

When writing emails, cc peace-keepers@mit.edu. Paper letters seem to be more 
effective than email, but emails are also great.


Practical info:

      name: Vest, Charles M
     email: cmvest@MIT.EDU
     phone: (617) 253-0148
   address: 3-208
     title: President
     alias: C-vest

      name: Clay, Phillip L
     email: plclay@MIT.EDU
     phone: (617) 253-6164
   address: 10-200
department: Chancellor'S Office
     title: Chancellor Professor Of City Planning
     alias: P-clay
 

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post