[991] in Moira
Re: moiradev vs. opssrc vs. the server
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathon Weiss)
Sat Jul 20 06:50:16 1996
From: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@MIT.EDU>
To: David K Krikorian <dkk@MIT.EDU>
Cc: danw@MIT.EDU, moiradev@MIT.EDU, moira-admin@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 19 Jul 1996 14:32:21 EDT."
<9607191832.AA21192@partly-cloudy.MIT.EDU>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 02:55:05 EDT
> > - hesiod.gen on moira2 generates an entry in services.db for
> >
> > clh.service HS UNSPECA "clh tcp 7971"
>
> The services.db file is maintained manually. (Note that, though all
> the other files in that directory have modtimes that match the last
> dcms, /moira/dcm/hesiod/services.db doesn't get updated.)
Are you sure? I think the hesiod dcm is smart enought to test
individually whether it needs to re-create many of the files used by
the hesiod server. It certainly seems reasonable that the services
table has not been updated recently. Also, if someone did hand-add
the clh entry, that would explain why it isn't in moira. If this
wasn't clh we were talking about I'd suggest that we might have a
cocked loaded gun pointed at our foot. :-)
> > - pobox.gen on moira2 seems to have had the patch from [887] in the
> > moira discuss meeting applied to it, but that patch wasn't applied
> > to opssrc or moiradev. (This has to do with fixing entries that
>
> Sigh. When I wrote in [887] that I'd applly the patch "soon," I meant
> when I caught up to that transaction in the disuss meeting. I'm still
> 10 transactions short. (I read it in email.)
Dan, why don't you go ahead and apply this, assuming Dave doesn't mind.
Jonathon
