[353] in Locker Maintainers
dimplomas for sale from accredited universities
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Miranda Navarro)
Tue Jun 29 21:47:14 2004
Message-ID: <EA1A59BB1560C.D72EB@ZBGNTHLU@pie.xtec.es>
Reply-To: "Miranda Navarro" <ZBGNTHLU@pie.xtec.es>
From: "Miranda Navarro" <ZBGNTHLU@pie.xtec.es>
To: "Locker-maintainers" <locker-maintainers@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:39:28 -0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--E79B11A6842096D"
----E79B11A6842096D
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-7EB6-7"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>eocene</title>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859=
-1">
</head>
<body>
<p><a href=3D"http://yelpp.biz/harrypotter.html"><img src=3D"http://www.YE=
LPP.biz/wind.JPG" width=3D"360" height=3D"300"></a></p>
<p><a href=3D"http://www.yelpp.biz/rd6.htm"><img src=3D"http://yelpp.biz/i=
mage.JPG" width=3D"360" height=3D"100" border=3D"0"></a></p>
In view of this dilemma there appears to be nothing else for it than to =
abandon either the principle of relativity or the simple law of the propag=
ation of light in vacuo. Those of you who have carefully followed the prec=
eding discussion are almost sure to expect that we should retain the princ=
iple of relativity, which appeals so convincingly to the intellect because=
it is so natural and simple. The law of the propagation of light in vacuo=
would then have to be replaced by a more complicated law conformable to t=
he principle of relativity. The development of theoretical physics shows, =
however, that we cannot pursue this course. The epoch-making theoretical i=
nvestigations of H. A. Lorentz on the electrodynamical and optical phenome=
na connected with moving bodies show that experience in this domain leads =
conclusively to a theory of electromagnetic phenomena, of which the law of=
the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo is a necessary consequenc=
e. Prominent theoretical physicists were therefore more inclined to reject=
the principle of relativity, in spite of the fact that no empirical data =
had been found which were contradictory to this principle. 5=20
</body>
</html>
----E79B11A6842096D--
