| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: "Davalos, Jeff (STL-MOM)" <Jeff.Davalos@momentumww.com> To: Martin Hochreiter <linuxbox@wavenet.at> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 08:58:27 -0500 Message-ID: <6A601FE545584844AF6E4A2C5E9EB0450424884383@OMAEDCCMS53.na.corp.ipgnetwork.com> In-Reply-To: <4E3FEABB.1030508@wavenet.at> Content-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "kerberos@mit.edu" <kerberos@mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Depending on your needs, NTLM can provide a single sign-on configuration.If Kerberos is your preference, due to security, then a Firefox browser configuration cannot provide that, as you said. -----Original Message-----From: Martin Hochreiter [mailto:linuxbox@wavenet.at] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 8:55 AMTo: Davalos, Jeff (STL-MOM)Cc: Schreiber Martin; kerberos@mit.eduSubject: Re: Firefox & Proxy & Kerberos Am 2011-08-08 15:46, schrieb Davalos, Jeff (STL-MOM):> We have also leveraged network.automatic, for single sign-on scenarios.>> Set network.automatic‐ntlm‐auth.trusted‐uris value to > “server1.domain.com” (double click to set) Set > network.negotiate‐auth.trusted‐uris value to “server1.domain.com” > (double click to set)>I have my doubts that the IronPort uses kerberos at all - just NTLM Auth ... (I traced some headers ) Thank you for your tipps, but i am afraid that can't be solved here ... regardsMartin ________________________________________________Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.eduhttps://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |