[33541] in Kerberos
Re: RFC: Turning off reverse hostname resolution by default in 1.10
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Russ Allbery)
Wed Jul 6 13:37:07 2011
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
To: kerberos@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <201107061727.p66HROpE002297@outgoing.mit.edu> (ghudson@mit.edu's
message of "Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:27:24 -0400 (EDT)")
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:37:05 -0700
Message-ID: <877h7ve2f2.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
ghudson@MIT.EDU writes:
> Does anyone on this list intentionally rely on PTR lookups for
> Kerberos hostname canonicalization?
We used to (we used to have load-balanced A records), but we stopped a
while back. As long as CNAMEs are resolved, we shouldn't notice.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
