[33222] in Kerberos
Re: [Contribution] How-to follow-up on patches
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Tue Feb 22 16:10:05 2011
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
To: Tom Yu <tlyu@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <ldvd3mj7s21.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:09:56 -0500
Message-ID: <1298408996.5931.185.camel@t410>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: "kerberos@mit.edu" <kerberos@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: kerberos-bounces@mit.edu
We talked about #6800 at our meeting today and I committed a fix. I
decided to go with a slightly different approach than the suggested
patch, because the current preferred style is to have a single "cleanup"
label rather than separate labels and cleanup code paths for success and
failure.
Thanks for the bug report.
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
