[1535] in Kerberos
Is it OK to use a CNAME for the kerberos master?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (haynes@cats.ucsc.edu)
Thu Aug 29 15:11:59 1991
To: kerberos@ATHENA.MIT.EDU
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 91 09:51:09 PDT
From: haynes@cats.ucsc.edu <haynes@cats.UCSC.EDU>
Up to now I've edited the various files as they come from MIT to use the
real name of the host that is my kerberos master server instead of
'kerberos'. Figger I can quit doing this if I make in the name server
'kerberos' a CNAME for the real name. Any reason this might be a
Bad Idea?
