[29] in Kakapo Windows Team
Re: Meeting tomorrow, I presume? + Agenda suggestions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Oliver Thomas)
Thu Jul 10 13:20:54 2003
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 13:20:50 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
Cc: Oliver Thomas <othomas@mit.edu>, Kerem B Limon <kerem.limon@mit.edu>,
Kakapos at MIT <kakapo@mit.edu>
To: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@mit.edu>
From: Oliver Thomas <othomas@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <200307092026.h69KQwPj008064@station-10.events.itd.umich.edu>
Message-Id: <DA5F0CAE-B2FA-11D7-83CC-000393A3632A@mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Actually, I'm a little confused by this as well, as there was
discussion about Accounts possibly picking up the creation of
containers through moira. I wouldn't shed a tear if someone else did
it, of course, but like Jonathon I would also like to be at the
discussion.
(As I mentioned in previous e-mails, I have a bi-weekly conflict with
Kakapo. I can make next week, but not this week or the meeting on the
24th. Once Kakapo moves to its bi-weekly schedule, the problem will
either go away or some re-scheduling will have to happen.)
Oliver
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 04:26 PM, Jonathon Weiss wrote:
>
>> 1) On handling container requests and tracking them: We had a short
>> discussion on this last time we met, and there was some discussion as
>> to
>> whether Ops would/could use CaseTracker, which seems to be the tool of
>> choice from the win.mit.edu and DART side. I would like to vote for
>> CaseTracker, however, I'd also like to understand and be mindful of
>> Jonathon's team and their procedures, since this task seems to be
>> shifting
>> to their area.
>
> Unfortunately, I'm out of town this week, and next, and for the
> obviously reason, would like to be around for this discussion. Is
> this something we can postpone fore a couple of weeks or is it really
> urgent that a decision is made right away? I gather it's the former.
> It would be useful to me if someone could explain to me what people
> hope to get by using casetracker, so I have a better idea of what the
> requirements are. I think I got part of this at the meeting two weeks
> ago, but don't feel like I have a full handle on it.
>
> I also wouldn't mind an oppertunity to confirm that everyone expects
> that container request processing is something that my group is
> picking up. It has long been my expectation that this would be the
> case, but I know other people have had other expectations, and I don't
> know if that's been totally resolved.
>
> Jonathon
