[174] in iswork
Re: Some fields and their "pick" lists
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Ferrara)
Sun Nov 26 10:42:25 2000
Message-Id: <4.0.2.20001124170842.009eb978@hesiod>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2000 17:13:42 -0500
To: tjm@mit.edu, iswork@mit.edu
From: Robert Ferrara <rferrara@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <3A1BEE49.5FA614D3@mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Tim,
Seems fine. Under phase proposed, you might add "finished". When a Discovery project like High speed Networking is completed without an implementation, this would apply.
Another Process/Performing organization is "Medical".
Can we have a link to the definition of each value, as you did in status?
Cheers, Bob
At 11:03 AM 11/22/2000 -0500, Tim McGovern wrote:
>To reiterate what I said earlier, I think it might reduce confusion if we modify
>the Phase list to have a "Project" phase, rather than have an IS organizational
>unit named as a phase. As we currently have it implemented:
>
>PHASE PHASE (Proposed)
> Planned Planned
> Discovery Project
> Delivery Operational
> Operational In Service
> Cancelled Cancelled
>
>STATUS
> Active
> Pending
> On Hold
> Completed
> Terminated
> See Comment
>
>PROCESS / PERFORMING ORGANIZATION <-- are there PO's other than Alumni
> Competency FSS and ODSUE whom we should add?
> Discovery
> Delivery
> Integration
> Service
> Support
> ABST
> Alumni
> FSS
> ODSUE
>
>IS REPORTING RESPONSIBILITY (pending but agreed to)
> Discovery
> Delivery
> Integration
>
>Tim
>
