[91056] in Cypherpunks
Re: PGP 5.0 ConsensuS?? -- is it usable?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William H. Geiger III)
Fri Nov 28 17:02:16 1997
From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 97 15:25:45 -0600
To: lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
In-Reply-To: <slrn67tug3.an.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>
Cc: cypherpunks@algebra.com
Reply-To: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii@invweb.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <slrn67tug3.an.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de>, on 11/28/97
at 05:06 PM, lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) said:
>* Anonymous Remailer wrote:
>>Do you think that it is a good idea to migrate from pgp 2.6.3 to
>>pgp 5.0 now?
>No.
Care to justify that?
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNH826o9Co1n+aLhhAQJt6QP/YqdAhhKkUQg3O3mQ75ppSGGQV+LV21i3
BP0BbTu9dNtvxhlfgVP6qAQnGew+xINN+LfWQNceXgwjGcuHuMJl/NG6pQzYrQLE
h5y7pA6A5e4IRAqX5XxpvPFkiD4mS0CstbdeKetZBOs4HmOHMR4EYpGUpxY2pX7C
Mc1ckCEoIgs=
=3PD1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
