[90913] in Cypherpunks
Re: Microsoft's compelled speech, compelled marketing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Glenn Hauman)
Tue Nov 25 22:35:50 1997
In-Reply-To: <v03007815b0a0bd483d3b@[204.254.22.197]>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 21:04:00 -0500
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>,
fight-censhorship <fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu>,
cypherpunks@toad.com
From: Glenn Hauman <hauman@bb.com>
Reply-To: Glenn Hauman <hauman@bb.com>
At 12:40 PM -0500 11/25/97, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>Former NY Times and Newseek reporter David Burnham writes in his book about
>the Justice Department: "The record is clear. Political campaign
>contributions, personal bribes and other direct and indirect favors have
>frequently influenced important Justice Department disions about the
>enforcement of law... Virtually every administration has demanded that the
>Justice Department bend the law..."
Hold it-- are you suggesting that the DOJ is being restrained in going
after Microsoft? By who?
Best-- Glenn Hauman, BiblioBytes
http://www.bb.com/
