[89666] in Cypherpunks
Re: [SURVEY try again] pgp5.x / pgp2.x users
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert A. Costner)
Sat Nov 8 21:03:15 1997
Date: Sat, 08 Nov 1997 20:22:27 -0500
To: 3umoelle@informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?= )
From: "Robert A. Costner" <pooh@efga.org>
Cc: iang@systemics.com (Ian Grigg), cypherpunks@algebra.com
In-Reply-To: <m0xUKDq-0003bQC@ulf.mali.sub.org>
Reply-To: "Robert A. Costner" <pooh@efga.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 12:23 AM 11/9/97 +0100, Ulf Möller wrote:
>> > 20 % of the users who have posted digitally signed messages that are
>> > available in my news spool (international and local newsgroups and
>> > mailing lists) use PGP 5. The sample contains 545 unique e-mail
>> > addresses. YMMV.
Just to skew the numbers, I for instance have PGP 5.0 but am using a 2.6.2
DOS generated key that is RSA, not DSS. Grepping would show me to be PGP5.x,
which perhaps technically I am, but my key is really 2.x
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQBVAwUBNGUQUEGpGhRXg5NZAQF7fQH5AfV2VfTwuLYs1ND6UTwoWIzAf3OjTSA8
saBlUQJquCUotwr5zk3cU+KiJJ9/hgLsLzOfet16ow1Do3zop7zUJw==
=VDPv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Robert Costner Phone: (770) 512-8746
Electronic Frontiers Georgia mailto:pooh@efga.org
http://www.efga.org/ run PGP 5.0 for my public key
