[67853] in Cypherpunks
Re: Why not PGP?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoff Klein)
Fri Oct 11 09:49:01 1996
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 06:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Klein <geoff@commtouch.co.il>
To: froomkin@law.miami.edu, rollo@artvark.com
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: froomkin@law.miami.edu, rollo@artvark.com, cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Fri Oct 11 15:08:50 1996
On 10 Oct Michael Froomkin wrote:
>> 2. Suppose someone writes a program Z that has no expicit crypto code
>> in it, but has hooks for installing one or another version of PGP. Given
>> a copy of Z, someone in this country could install PGP he got from MIT,
>> whereas someone in Europe could install the international version.
>> Would export of Z violate ITAR restrictions?
>
> Yes, but these are currently being challenged in 3 separate court
> actions.
Can you post a reference to more info about these actions please.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geoff Klein, Pronto Secure Product Manager
http://www.commtouch.com, Tel: 972-9-963445 (ext 130), Fax: 972-9-961053
For my PGP public key send mail with subject: Get Key
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMl441ELv5OMYFK1FAQF8tQQAipKnURVdvOMRiOdKNPXjDO13ZL7qyXqy
s3Bk6THTWxMLGhmuHc566NdZAMjQJIRFPKjf/0OJdiu9XZYPAGZjo42ry435hG0S
4WqfN19MIhVN0oLpCSTz/cUFQFBGh916icPjnp43/2fx+rqCfcF87MCicBUjukFd
X34M9N91cLs=
=PNAM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
