[67848] in Cypherpunks
Re: Why not PGP?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoff Klein)
Fri Oct 11 09:37:31 1996
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 1996 06:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Klein <geoff@commtouch.co.il>
To: liberty@gate.net, rollo@artvark.com, cypherpunks@toad.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: liberty@gate.net, rollo@artvark.com, cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Fri Oct 11 15:08:41 1996
On 10 Octt Rollo Silver wrote:
> 2. Suppose someone writes a program Z that has no expicit crypto code
> in it, but has hooks for installing one or another version of PGP. Given
> a copy of Z, someone in this country could install PGP he got from MIT,
> whereas someone in Europe could install the international version.
Pronto Secure is an e-mail client which pretty much fits Z.
> Would export of Z violate ITAR restrictions?
Good question.
Anyone know if exporting Z has been tested ?
Commtouch does not currently export Pronto Secure from the US :)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Geoff Klein, Pronto Secure Product Manager
http://www.commtouch.com, Tel: 972-9-963445 (ext 130), Fax: 972-9-961053
For my PGP public key send mail with subject: Get Key
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBMl44zELv5OMYFK1FAQES/AQApuvGj1DFHOhSkUVJ4tyaQpHUYapC8cDA
I3HOd9Ic5hS4u/NCHFbHPlvbe+kFN8jBDlwtLcyOtbFiWcfOTJJcvJAWQgSadjjf
zvdfxFs5DXzIIepijQoGBSOtcPKn8F4UtxQ47G/7SViEUob1OkCrFUxmOtpkuFDh
5Yd720FJEnI=
=NdPu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
