[66362] in Cypherpunks
Re: SAY WHAT? [Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (attila)
Tue Sep 24 19:25:02 1996
From: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Reply-To: attila <attila@primenet.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 96 23:02:32 +0000
To: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960924143919.28504B-100000@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In <Pine.SUN.3.91.960924143919.28504B-100000@tipper.oit.unc.edu>, on
09/24/96
at 03:19 PM, Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu> said:
= .On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, attila wrote:
= .>
= .> go back to your beloved England and your labour unions
= . your roots are showing :-) ----^
REALLY?
= .> NO, I will not outright reject Jim Bell's "Assassination
= .> Politics."
= .Assasination politics is impossible to defend from a classical
= .Liberal/Libertarian position. Bell advocates arbitrary applications
= .of violence and coercion without restriction. There is no way to
= .justify the initiation of force without abandoning any pretence of
= .being a Libertarian (which, to be fair, Bell doesn't claim to be).
all very true. but I will defend Jim Bell's rights to propose
them, even if Bell is more than a few cards short of a full deck.
--
Politicians are like diapers.
They both need changing regularly, and for the same reason.
