[46728] in Cypherpunks
Re: Mixmaster On A $20 Floppy?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Futplex)
Sun Jan 7 18:55:38 1996
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 18:45:56 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
In-Reply-To: <ad15159e03021004e3e7@[137.110.24.250]> from "Lance Cottrell" at Jan 6, 96 10:32:44 pm
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I wrote:
# I suppose that a site that escapes detection as a Mixmaster will throw off
# the correlation stats (i.e. because a message from that site to B won't be
# identified as a remailed message). But such sites are elusive objects I
# think. On the one hand, the site can't endure for long, or else its
# throughput traffic will likely give it away as an anonymizer (i.e. it gets
# lots of mail from the Mix network, and sends out similar amounts of mail to
# all sorts of people and the network). On the other hand, it had better last,
# or else it will look suspicious as a transient account receiving mail from
# the Mix network, sending a few messages, and quickly vanishing.
Lance writes:
> The second paragraph seems to deal with the issue of being known as an
> anonymous remailer or regular remailer user. I am not sure exactly what the
> concern with that is.
I was trying to explore possible ways to beat TA with less bandwidth, in the
context of transient (w.r.t. network address) anonymizers. I indicated doubt
about the possibility of any real gain, and as I think about it more I'm
not able to convince myself that there's any real value at all in that
regard.
Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com> - "IBM ?"
Go Colts ! - "All the girls are doing it"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBMPBbEynaAKQPVHDZAQGm7wf+LbaZeZqI8/qwBQi+6vS4bzvtSkdf9i1v
aD8I0jlNLAmFsPQ6dJ0mOBObPz8b+3PbJ1/TCyr5w0vWcb6XpEemblqNf1H+SdY+
nP6Xbmdoyie2cObGjYOz8HHvhg+qANnanIqtax/CPd9smPMcLnl20pyLJPhlFRPG
MUQX33yIrxXEGY0os725Q1lQDWHaMpbt65+quzVZYFAfaNzBzQ99vy4ZrzsBPZIK
GLiqPcygWt3Kxfk7O0WjI2Gic3nrrpP1X5SxWwFnGQmlm9Zd9FwJxhpLsW4s+0B0
CNAI8c1ASA9AebLVVYVP4riQRkVDK/BYYSJLcXQfp2TzDSgPXg32JQ==
=coNU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
