[462] in Cypherpunks
Consider "Working Assets" phone service instead of AT&T
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick Tufts)
Fri May 21 10:30:53 1993
Date: Fri, 21 May 93 10:18:29 -0400
From: Patrick Tufts <zippy@berry.cs.brandeis.edu>
To: gg@well.sf.ca.us
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com, jet@nas.nasa.gov
In-Reply-To: George A. Gleason's message of Fri, 21 May 1993 02:35:20 -0700 <199305210935.AA00447@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: Fri, 21 May 1993 02:35:20 -0700
From: George A. Gleason <gg@well.sf.ca.us>
[....]
it. So sign with Working Assets and write them a note telling them you want
to see a phonecard-only option soon, and chances are they'll be responsive
if they get enough of those. Especially if they're getting them from people
who used to have accounts with teh Big Three.
^^^ ^^^^^
Isn't Working Assets just a reseller of AT+T (or is it Sprint) LD? As
such, you're still giving business to one of "the Big Three".
