[45765] in Cypherpunks
GAK boycott, What are legal implications?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Elliott)
Thu Dec 21 18:51:31 1995
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 1995 20:58:24 -0600
From: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org>
To: efh-directors%blkbox.com.eff-austin-directors@zilker.com (EFH board of directors) (EFF austin board of directors),
vtw@vtw.org, cypherpunks@toad.com, action@eff.org,
libernet@dartmouth.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Here is a question for all of you cyber legal types out there.
This question presupposes:
The NIST will complete its work on the GAK standard. But no law will be
passed (yet) regulating the use of encryption in the U. S. (The GAK standard
is an attempt to create an environment in which such laws can be passed.)
In the U.S., Big Company INC will start marketing a GAKed encryption
product domesticly.
A bunch of cypherpunkish types will immediately try to organize a boycott
against BIG COMPANY.
What are the cypherpunks legal risks?
I seem to remember that back in the 70s, the NAACP lost a big case
with respect to their boycott in a southern city. As I recall there were people
in the street begging money for the NAACP because there was a > 10**6 $
judgement against the NAACP and they needed that much just to appeal.
- --
Paul Elliott Telephone: 1-713-781-4543
Paul.Elliott@hrnowl.lonestar.org Address: 3987 South Gessner #224
Houston Texas 77063
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMNnJ8/BUQYbUhJh5AQGbsgP/T0n31SqeuHt+7AbizymcEhu/78DUuym5
sj+MO3ruA9WcEBQUXfabuf/PgOwlrtUAcC3dISPvXwGbdygc9oHBfxSglLi48g7d
dvDS4wziRHF7N8sBsYn0ee9YyKhPd9U7Ci0ovOc5frFGSZ2Bt4hU703d7bR+6cB+
iHHqsPaAa6o=
=EPoj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
